2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint control of plant ecological strategy by climate, regeneration mode, and ontogeny in Northeastern Chinese forests

Abstract: Research on how plant ecological strategies (competitive, stress‐tolerant, or ruderal) vary within species may improve our understanding of plant and community responses to climate warming and also successional changes. With increasing temperature, the importance of ruderal (R) and stress tolerance (S) components is hypothesized to decrease, while the strength of the competitive (C) component should increase. Offshoots and younger plants are predicted to have greater R and smaller S components. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other comparisons within natural vegetation (e.g. Thomas & Bazzaz, 1999; Hölscher, 2004; Martínez‐Garza & Howe, 2005; Ishida et al ., 2005; Kenzo et al ., 2006, 2015; studies gathered in Poorter et al ., 2009; Kitajima & Poorter, 2010; Liu et al ., 2010; Spasojevic et al ., 2014; Zhang & Wang, 2021; Martin & Isaac, 2021), seedling and sapling leaves have developed in shade compared to top‐of‐canopy leaves. These comparisons will have light‐response plasticity laid on top of effects of plant size, since LMA is known to decrease up to about three‐fold from high to low light intensities (Poorter et al ., 2009).…”
Section: Leaf Mass Per Area Adjustment With Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other comparisons within natural vegetation (e.g. Thomas & Bazzaz, 1999; Hölscher, 2004; Martínez‐Garza & Howe, 2005; Ishida et al ., 2005; Kenzo et al ., 2006, 2015; studies gathered in Poorter et al ., 2009; Kitajima & Poorter, 2010; Liu et al ., 2010; Spasojevic et al ., 2014; Zhang & Wang, 2021; Martin & Isaac, 2021), seedling and sapling leaves have developed in shade compared to top‐of‐canopy leaves. These comparisons will have light‐response plasticity laid on top of effects of plant size, since LMA is known to decrease up to about three‐fold from high to low light intensities (Poorter et al ., 2009).…”
Section: Leaf Mass Per Area Adjustment With Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2022 The Authors New Phytologist Ó 2022 New Phytologist Foundation New Phytologist (2022) 235: 842-847 www.newphytologist.comattributed to properties of the species or the situation, and some to experimental noise.In other comparisons within natural vegetation (e.g Thomas & Bazzaz, 1999;Hölscher, 2004;Martı ´nez-Garza & Howe, 2005;Ishida et al, 2005;Kenzo et al, 2006Kenzo et al, , 2015. studies gathered in Poorter et al, 2009;Kitajima & Poorter, 2010;Liu et al, 2010;Spasojevic et al, 2014;Zhang & Wang, 2021;Martin & Isaac, 2021), seedling and sapling leaves have developed in shade Assumed constant in trait-growth theory; however, this is in the nature of a null assumption rather than a strong prediction. If true, mass-basis photosynthetic capacity and leaf nitrogen are expected to decrease with height.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used individual size (basal diameter, BD) to represent different ontogenetic stages of P. massoniana (Dayrell et al., 2018 ; Zhang & Wang, 2021 ). The BD ranges were similar across the three plots: 11.15–159.74, 12.41–159.51, and 10.26–165.24 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the dominant species in a resource‐limited system shifts from those with a high stress‐tolerant strategy to those with C and R strategies as the availability of water and soil nutrients increases (Butterfield & Briggs, 2011 ; Rosado et al., 2017 ). Similarly, warmer temperatures lead to reduced R and S components while augmenting plant competitiveness (Rosenfield et al., 2019 ; Zhang & Wang, 2021 ). Both May et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Harvard forests, a 5 °C increase in soil temperature provided more available nitrogen for plants (Melillo et al, 2002). In addition, the biogeochemical hypothesis indicates that the increase of foliar N concentrate under elevated temperature is correlated to strengthened plant photosynthesis and increased plant nitrogen absorption capacity of (Zhang and Wang, 2021). The above two pathways could explain higher foliar nitrogen in a warming scenario.…”
Section: Climatic Change Effect On Seedling Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%