2003 Proceedings of the International Conference on Radar (IEEE Cat. No.03EX695)
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2003.1278735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint deinterleaving/recognition of radar pulses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pulse repetition rate can be either constant, staggered, or jittered. [29][30][31] If more than one emitter is present, an electronic warfare (EW) receiver must sort the received pulses based on the signal parameters including the carrier frequency (f c ), pulse width (PW), pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse amplitude, and DOA 29 to identify the individual emitters. In EW receivers, time-of-arrival (TOA) measurement is usually the most accurate parameter available.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pulse repetition rate can be either constant, staggered, or jittered. [29][30][31] If more than one emitter is present, an electronic warfare (EW) receiver must sort the received pulses based on the signal parameters including the carrier frequency (f c ), pulse width (PW), pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse amplitude, and DOA 29 to identify the individual emitters. In EW receivers, time-of-arrival (TOA) measurement is usually the most accurate parameter available.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radar pulse deinterleaving algorithms can be broadly classified into two main categories: interval‐only and multi‐parametric [7, 8]. Interval‐only algorithms use the TOA information of different pulses to derive techniques based on histogramming [9, 10], statistic association [11] or extended Kalman filter [12–14] which can determine the PRI of the radars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering technique is employed in [6] to sort the mixed signal based on one or more parameters into different bins. The number of emitters can be identified on the basis of a threshold or through joint recognition and identification [7, 22]. Another class of techniques use a number of self‐organising neural network algorithms, such as fuzzy adaptive resonance theory, fuzzy clustering and Min–Max clustering [8], to compare if the pulses are from the same emitter using parameters other than TOA such as RF and DOA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the known radar signal processing, the use of correlation between the priori knowledge and radar the received signal [2], sorting accuracy and real-time have reached a certain height. But the problem sorting unknown signal from the density radar pulse streams which contains a lot of interfering pulse has been restricting the radar surveillance data processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%