Joint deployment, beamforming and power allocation of MmWave full-duplex UAV-BS

Ding, Qi; Luo, Yang; Yang, Runfeng; Hu, Jia; Luo, Chunbo

doi:10.1145/3555661.3560876

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The iteration process continues until the decrease in transmit power falls below a predefined threshold ǫ. The default parameter settings are β 0 = −60dB [12], σ 2 = −110dBm [12], ρ = −110dB [15] and ǫ = 10 −3 [13].…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2. The transmit power at S is set to 20dBm [13]. As expected in Remark 1, when h min is small, IRSs could be deployed near S or D, otherwise they should be placed at the midpoint.…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The coordinates of S, D and R are given by (0, 0, 0), (L, 0, 0) and (x U , y U , h U ), respectively. Hence the deterministic air-to-ground channel gain from S to R and that from R to D are, respectively, expressed by [12], [13]…”

Section: System Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces vs. Full-Duplex Relays: A Comparison in the Air

Ding,

Yang,

Luo

et al. 2024

IEEE Commun. Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This letter aims to provide a fundamental analytical comparison for the two major types of relaying methods: intelligent reflecting surfaces and full-duplex relays, particularly focusing on unmanned aerial vehicle communication scenarios. Both amplify-and-forward and decode-and-forward relaying schemes are included in the comparison. In addition, optimal 3D UAV deployment and minimum transmit power under the quality of service constraint are derived. Our numerical results show that IRSs of medium size exhibit comparable performance to AF relays, meanwhile outperforming DF relays under extremely large surface size and high data rates.

show abstract

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2. The transmit power at S is set to 20dBm [13]. As expected in Remark 1, when h min is small, IRSs could be deployed near S or D, otherwise they should be placed at the midpoint.…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%