2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50417-5_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Entity Linking for Web Tables with Hybrid Semantic Matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 10 shows a comparison of the qualitative indicators with the closest works [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][35][36][37][40][41][42][43][44][45][47][48][49][50]. We have grouped all existing methods into two classes: heuristic methods and deep-learning-based methods (e.g., using Deep Neural Networks (DNN) or BERT models).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 10 shows a comparison of the qualitative indicators with the closest works [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][35][36][37][40][41][42][43][44][45][47][48][49][50]. We have grouped all existing methods into two classes: heuristic methods and deep-learning-based methods (e.g., using Deep Neural Networks (DNN) or BERT models).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be noted that many solutions seemed to specialize in one particular STI task. For example, [42] proposes a new hybrid semantic matching model called JHSTabEL for entity linking in a table. A feature of this model is the collection of local semantic information between text mentions in a table and candidate entities from the perspective of different semantic aspects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation