Analytical Studies in Transport Economics 1986
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511895913.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint estimation of freight transportation decisions under nonrandom sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Selectivity bias can be accounted for in this usage model by linking the model to a discrete type-choice model, and adding into the structural equation system a correction term variable involving a transformation of the household's predicted type vehicle choice 22 probabilities (McFadden et al, 1985;Mannering and Winston, 1985;Train, 1986;Hensher, et al, 1992). It is doubtful that such a correction term would have any pronounced effect on the results.…”
Section: Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selectivity bias can be accounted for in this usage model by linking the model to a discrete type-choice model, and adding into the structural equation system a correction term variable involving a transformation of the household's predicted type vehicle choice 22 probabilities (McFadden et al, 1985;Mannering and Winston, 1985;Train, 1986;Hensher, et al, 1992). It is doubtful that such a correction term would have any pronounced effect on the results.…”
Section: Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the error terms of the discrete vehicle type choice model and the vehicle usage model are correlated, the parameter estimates will be biased. A linear correction term involving a transformation of predicted vehicle type choice probabilities can be applied to the usage model to account for self selectivity bias (McFadden et al, 1985;Mannering and Winston, 1985;Train, 1986;Hensher, et al, 1992). Empirically, however, the selectivity corrections applied in utilization models to account for endogeneity bias have not had substantial effects on estimation results (Train, 1986;Hensher, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disaggregate joint shipment size and mode choice models have been around since McFadden et al (1985), as pointed out in Regan and Garrido (2001). The model developed by de Jong and Ben-Akiva (2007) expands on the mode choice aspect into a set of commodity distribution chain choices.…”
Section: Joint Shipment Size and Transport Chain Choice Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-documented in the literature that shipment size determines the choice of mode/vehicle and vice versa (see for example, McFadden et al 1986;Inaba and Wallace, 1989;Abdelwahab and Sargious, 1992;Holguin-Veras 2002;Johnson and de Jong, 2011). In addition to recognizing this simultaneous decision process, these studies show that various haul, carrier, and commodity characteristics are important factors that affect the decision on the optimal shipment size and vehicle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%