2015 7th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/whispers.2015.8075496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint estimation of water column parameters and seabed reflectance combining maximum likelihood and unmixing algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, regularised methods have been evaluated in homogeneous sandy habitats because, in its current version, ML (and therefore MAP) assumes that the water quality and bottom type are homogeneous within a local neighbourhood (i.e., the statistical sample). To deal with more complex bottom covers or lower spatial resolutions, the generalization of ML and MAP to heterogeneous bottoms is currently investigated and involves a modified likelihood function and an unmixing technique to provide a different estimate of bottom spectrum in each pixel (Guillaume, Michels, and Jay 2015). Note that the proposed regularisation approach can naturally be extended either to multispectral data (similarly to non-regularised methods) and to other similar estimation method in the same way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, regularised methods have been evaluated in homogeneous sandy habitats because, in its current version, ML (and therefore MAP) assumes that the water quality and bottom type are homogeneous within a local neighbourhood (i.e., the statistical sample). To deal with more complex bottom covers or lower spatial resolutions, the generalization of ML and MAP to heterogeneous bottoms is currently investigated and involves a modified likelihood function and an unmixing technique to provide a different estimate of bottom spectrum in each pixel (Guillaume, Michels, and Jay 2015). Note that the proposed regularisation approach can naturally be extended either to multispectral data (similarly to non-regularised methods) and to other similar estimation method in the same way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some existing algorithms can tackle this issue with a high level of accuracy [42][43][44]. When unmixing pixels, algorithms may face errors due to the heterogeneity of seabed reflectance, disturbing the radiance with the light scattered on the neighboring elements [45]. This process, called the adjacency effect, has negative effects on the accuracy of remote sensing [46] and can modify the radiance by up to 26% depending on turbidity and water depth [47].…”
Section: Spatial and Spectral Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) The linear mixing model is currently used for seabed estimation with other methods (such as LS inversion with a spectral library) [9,18,20,21,33,[35][36][37][38]46].…”
Section: Decomposition Of Target and Environment Reflectancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seabed mapping is also developed in [36]. In [37], Maritorena's radiative transfer model [13] has been used to combine iteratively ML estimation and N MF unmixing to obtain simultaneously the water parameters, the endmember spectra and the relative abundances. Recently a Bayesian approach has been proposed [20] for linear mixtures to jointly estimate the seabed reflectance and water optical properties while flexibly incorporating varied domain knowledge and in situ measurements, using Maritorena's model, and simulations from Hydrolight radiative transfer code.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%