2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint inversion of Wenner and dipole–dipole data to study a gasoline-contaminated soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This maintains the signal-to-noise ratio as high as for the Wenner array. To combine the advantages of these two different arrays, the two apparent resistivity data sets are merged into the same inversion process (Loke, 2000;De la Vega et al, 2003).…”
Section: Ertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This maintains the signal-to-noise ratio as high as for the Wenner array. To combine the advantages of these two different arrays, the two apparent resistivity data sets are merged into the same inversion process (Loke, 2000;De la Vega et al, 2003).…”
Section: Ertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) section by a joint inversion of the Wenner and dipole-dipole measurements, to improve the depth resolution (de la Vega et al 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mode was selected since it represented the best available compromise between vertical and horizontal sensitivity to resistivity changes (Dahlin 1989;De La Vega et al 2003). The apparent-resistivity pseudosections were inverted using the popular commercial code RES2DINV (Loke and Barker, 1996;www.geoelectrical.com), producing series of 2-D cross-sections of inferred resistivities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%