2019
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2018.2866945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Job Partitioning and Collaborative Computation Offloading for Internet of Things

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several IoT applicationa are latency sensitive [1,25]. Due to computation power limitation of IoT devices, the IoT application owners may prefer to run their applications on the edge servers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several IoT applicationa are latency sensitive [1,25]. Due to computation power limitation of IoT devices, the IoT application owners may prefer to run their applications on the edge servers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [17] considered the energy and the latency as the overhead and adopted a distributed gametheoretic approach to reduce the overall network overhead. Mu et al [18] jointly considered the application partitioning and collaborative computation offloading, so that UEs may help each other on task execution to meet the completion deadline of the applications while minimizing the overall energy consumption. Meskar et al [19] constructed a network where users share the communication channel to offload their computations as a competitive game, and obtained an optimum offloading decision for minimizing user energy consumption while satisfying the deadline of the applications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computation latency was minimized by optimizing task assignment jointly with the time for task offloading and results downloading, subject to the individual energy constraints at the local user and the collaborators. In [9], we investigated the application partitioning and collaborator selection problem for multiple users when multiple idle collaborative devices are available. Both the centralized and decentralized algorithms were proposed to minimize the energy consumption of all the users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the traffic burden and computation load on the edge base station and servers are effectively alleviated. Most of the existing works [8][9][10][11] on peer-to-peer computing mainly consider that collaborators offer constant idle computation resources until completing the offloaded computation loads. However, due to its own tasks with high priority, the central processing unit (CPU) state of collaborators is opportunistically idle and available to the offloaded tasks [12,13], which is different from the dedicated resource provisioning of edge servers for IoT subscribers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%