2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint maintenance and inventory optimization systems: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
92
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to include papers published in other databases or those that did not use our search terms, citations in the review papers were traced. In total, ten relevant journal articles were incorporated [1,2,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Survey papers were examined paragraph by paragraph with specific focus on review findings, research gaps and limitations and recommendations for further research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to include papers published in other databases or those that did not use our search terms, citations in the review papers were traced. In total, ten relevant journal articles were incorporated [1,2,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Survey papers were examined paragraph by paragraph with specific focus on review findings, research gaps and limitations and recommendations for further research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance models often rely on the assumption that spare parts are always available in stock [103]. As such, one can optimize maintenance and spare parts inventory decisions independently.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizations can improve performance by sharing back-office services and service delivery (Arya, 2011;Niehaves and Krause, 2010), or bundle incoming or outgoing logistical flows to reduce environmental impact and monetary costs. And finally, organizations may share assets, pool stocks and co-organize maintenance services to improve economies of scale, uptime, safety, and capacity use (Karsten and Basten, 2014;Van Horenbeek et al, 2013). Inter-organizational cooperation could enable proactive and life-cycle based approaches to maintenance which reduce overall costs over time (Van der Lei et al, 2012).…”
Section: Sustaining Operations and Reducing Stakeholder Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value chains become more predictable, reliable, and proactive (Van Horenbeek et al, 2013); this may enhance value chain adaptability, and capacity use while reducing costs and risks (Shirodkar and Kempf, 2006). Advantages work both sides.…”
Section: Iss and Value Chains: A Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation