2012
DOI: 10.1080/16843703.2012.11673274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Monitoring Scheme for Clinical Failures and Predisposed Risks

Abstract: Measuring quality of medical practice is a key component in improving efficiency in health care.It is becoming increasingly prominent in quality management. At present, risk-adjusted monitoring tools are only used to monitor clinical failures. By using a sensitivity analysis, real life applications and simulated examples, we demonstrate that it is not sufficient to solely monitor clinical failures. In this paper, we propose to jointly monitor clinical failures and predisposed risks of patients. This joint moni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cardiac surgery examples shown in Steiner et al , the control limits for the proposed CUSUM charts were set at specified levels to give the relatively large ARL 0 values given the patient population and the fitted risk‐adjustment models. However, several researchers have brought up issues about the effect of different risk distributions on the performance of risk‐adjusted CUSUM charts with constant control limits (see references , ). The ARL 0 values of risk‐adjusted CUSUM charts with the same risk adjustment model and constant control limits can vary by a factor of 10 for the highest and lowest risk patient populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cardiac surgery examples shown in Steiner et al , the control limits for the proposed CUSUM charts were set at specified levels to give the relatively large ARL 0 values given the patient population and the fitted risk‐adjustment models. However, several researchers have brought up issues about the effect of different risk distributions on the performance of risk‐adjusted CUSUM charts with constant control limits (see references , ). The ARL 0 values of risk‐adjusted CUSUM charts with the same risk adjustment model and constant control limits can vary by a factor of 10 for the highest and lowest risk patient populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have indicated that a change in patient risk distribution, which is usually assumed to be constant over time, can affect the control chart’s performance to monitor surgical performance. 4 , 16 19 , Previous studies, which took into account the variation in patient mix, often examined only a small number of different scenarios, which can be explained by limitations to simple manual manipulations or reclassifications of the used empirical data. Steiner et al measured their RA approach’s sensitivity for the patient mix from two surgeons in their sample data with the most extreme patient mixes 1 and for lowest risk and highest risk patients only.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 Furthermore, even when the RA-CUSUM chart has been adjusted for the patients' risks, it remains sensitive to changes in the underlying predisposed risk distribution and the baseline incidence rate. 17,18 We propose a risk-adjusted Bernoulli CUSUM (RA-B-CUSUM) chart, very easy to implement and whose setting does not require great computational effort; in addition, it is not sensitive to changes in the underlying predisposed risk distribution and in the baseline incidence rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%