2020
DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2020.2978482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Offloading and IEEE 802.11p-based Contention Control in Vehicular Edge Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some state-of-art models are included for performance comparison, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [30], CNN, Naive Bayes [31], AlexNet, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) [32]. In the performance analysis, the proposed algorithm is compared with the model algorithm proposed by other scholars from the data transmission delay [33], throughput [34], average transmission power [35], and data transmission accuracy [36]. The modeling tools are summarized in Table I:…”
Section: Simulation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some state-of-art models are included for performance comparison, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [30], CNN, Naive Bayes [31], AlexNet, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) [32]. In the performance analysis, the proposed algorithm is compared with the model algorithm proposed by other scholars from the data transmission delay [33], throughput [34], average transmission power [35], and data transmission accuracy [36]. The modeling tools are summarized in Table I:…”
Section: Simulation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this mechanism has considered offloading data as one piece either to another node or to cloud, while the required data availability in each node has been ignored. Nguyen et al [12] have suggested an offloading mechanism for computation-intensive applications either in Vehicle Edge Computing (VEC) or in Roadside Units (RSUs). While this work considers making offloading decision for extensive computational applications (e.g., autonomous driving and vehicular video stream), data access in each node has not been considered.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EC nodes receive the data generated by application layer and store them locally until data accessing pattern are required [16]. The decision of either to execute these tasks locally, offload it to another node or in the cloud can be made based on different factors such as task size, time, popularity, upload/download data, and resources availability in nodes [12], [15]. The cloud layer has unlimited computation resources and thus tasks can be offloaded through e.g., Base Stations (BSs) from the EC layers due to limited resources or failure in completing tasks.…”
Section: B Service Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Du et al 18 . minimized the cost of vehicles, and Nguyen et al 19 improved vehicular service and reduced energy consumption by offloading their task to the VEC server. However, the offloading efficiency of binary offloading will be affected by the limited computation resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%