2021
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2019.2960328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Scheduling and Incentive Mechanism for Spatio-Temporal Vehicular Crowd Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They formulated the incentivizing problem as a knapsack problem and proposed an algorithm named iLOCuS to solve the problem. Fan et al [47] proposed a joint trajectory scheduling and incentive mechanism for spatio-temporal crowd sensing systems. They designed an online incentive mechanism that decided whether to recruit a participant when he/she asked to contribute sensing data.…”
Section: Incentive Mechanisms For Mcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They formulated the incentivizing problem as a knapsack problem and proposed an algorithm named iLOCuS to solve the problem. Fan et al [47] proposed a joint trajectory scheduling and incentive mechanism for spatio-temporal crowd sensing systems. They designed an online incentive mechanism that decided whether to recruit a participant when he/she asked to contribute sensing data.…”
Section: Incentive Mechanisms For Mcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, high user participation is required for keeping sensed information up-to-date. Several research initiatives have already been dealing with the topic of incentives [ 12 , 13 , 14 ], primarily focusing on monetary incentives, which can be tuned to favor honest reports while minimizing expenditures for the provider. Such techniques include reverse auction approaches [ 15 ], Stackelberg game models [ 16 ], reputation systems that quantify users’ trustworthiness [ 17 ], as well as systems for estimating and utilizing the users’ expertise [ 18 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the solutions proposed in these works do not consider important aspects that should be considered when the client is a vehicle, such as fast mobility, frequent network topology changes, and variations in wireless communication channels [17]. In [18], clients are smartphones of people inside vehicles that send tasks to be processed on traditional cloud servers. However, in this computation offloading process, the distinctive aspects of vehicular networks are also not considered, and the objectives do not include reducing the execution time of vehicular applications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%