2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
184
0
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
184
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, researchers had used many ways to measure the effects of risk sources and supply chain practices with different means like firm or organizational performance (Cook et al, 2011;Shukla et al, 2013), product performance, operational performance (Kauppi et al, 2016;Sukati et al, 2013), logistic performance (Effendi, 2015), financial performance (Li et al, 2015) or operational performance (Ahmad and Saifudin, 2014;Chen, 2012;Sukati et al, 2012;Sundram et al, 2016). Nevertheless, indicators to measure above mention performance are alike.…”
Section: Operational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, researchers had used many ways to measure the effects of risk sources and supply chain practices with different means like firm or organizational performance (Cook et al, 2011;Shukla et al, 2013), product performance, operational performance (Kauppi et al, 2016;Sukati et al, 2013), logistic performance (Effendi, 2015), financial performance (Li et al, 2015) or operational performance (Ahmad and Saifudin, 2014;Chen, 2012;Sukati et al, 2012;Sundram et al, 2016). Nevertheless, indicators to measure above mention performance are alike.…”
Section: Operational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Millions of dollars' worth of merchandise sat on vessels seized on behalf of creditors, denied entry to ports or left unable to dock, while firms tried to make alternative arrangements to meet contractual obligations with their clients and minimize the financial impact of supply chain disruptions. According to empirical evidence, firms experience, on average, a 40 percent decline in their stock price after a disruption, while shareholder value can decrease by 11 percent (Li et al, 2015).…”
Section: Table 1 Supply Chain Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it helps prevent the occurrence of events that could become risks if no action is taken (Yu and Goh, 2014). Third, since it provides real-time information on events in the supply chain, it enables rapid implementation of risk management measures, minimizing the risk of disruptions (Li et al, 2015). Empirical evidence shows that the more information is shared along the supply chain, the better the risk management and the financial performance of the supply chain (Li et al, 2015).…”
Section: Information Systems Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However not only the structural characteristics of SC networks could affect risk management approach and strategy selection. [38], [39] and [40] have proved through their studies, that relationship dimensions between SC actors could influence the decision process and even the risk level and SCRM efficiency ( [45]). According to [5], the success of any SCRM strategy relies on the "SCRM culture" shared between SC entities.…”
Section: Supply Chain Risk Integrated Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%