2022
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2021.3138869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Transmit Resource Management and Waveform Selection Strategy for Target Tracking in Distributed Phased Array Radar Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where I 3 is the identity matrix of order 3, ⊗ is the Kronecker product, and τ q denotes the process noise intensity [33].…”
Section: A Dynamic Model For Target Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where I 3 is the identity matrix of order 3, ⊗ is the Kronecker product, and τ q denotes the process noise intensity [33].…”
Section: A Dynamic Model For Target Qmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PC-FIM (33) shows that the positions of multi-UAV have an impact on the tracking performance, which motivates us to optimize the trajectories of multiple UAVs to achieve the optimal MTT performance. Since the elements of the PC-CRLB matrix have different units, it cannot be adopted as an objective function directly, we perform a trace operation on the normalized PC-CRLB as follows:…”
Section: B Cto Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed a cost function that could adapt to several radar measurement errors to improve tracking performance and could save the time resources of CR. For target tracking in radar networks, Shi et al [20] investigated the joint transmit resource management and waveform selection to coordinate the time resource and waveform resource of each radar node to improve tracking performance as well as the low probability of intercept (LPI) performance. A particle swarm optimisation-based three-stage solution was developed to solve the RRM problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the question which we pursue here. We acknowledge that a practical characterization of online learning performance for all waveform selection tasks is beyond the scope of a single investigation, but present insight towards the general question by examining compelling performance measures for two broad applications of practical interest, namely radar dynamic spectrum access [8], [35], [36] and multiple target tracking [2], [37], [38]. We apply tools from decision theory and information theory to compare the performance of an online learning-based waveform selection algorithm with fixed rule-based strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%