1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03302-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint use of L-moment diagram and goodness-of-fit test: a case study of diverse series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L-moments based regional frequency analysis is practiced all over the world (for example, Guttman et al 1993;Smithers and Schulze 2001;Ben-Zvi and Azmon 1997;Pandey et al 2001;Elamir and Seheult 2001;Jingyi and Hall 2004;Saf 2009;Eslamian and Feizi 2007;Modarres 2007;Norbiato et al 2007;Hussain and Pasha 2009;Castellarin et al 2008;Yang et al 2009) but an important aspect, in the comparison of quality of the quantile estimates obtained at each site from regional approach to that of at-site analysis, is how can we calculate the standard errors of the estimated quantiles at each site of a homogeneous region? In this paper, a relationship provided in Hosking and Wallis (1997) has been explored and standard errors of the estimated flood quantiles at each site of the homogeneous regions have been calculated by extending the results of the simulation experiments related to the accuracy measures of the regional estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L-moments based regional frequency analysis is practiced all over the world (for example, Guttman et al 1993;Smithers and Schulze 2001;Ben-Zvi and Azmon 1997;Pandey et al 2001;Elamir and Seheult 2001;Jingyi and Hall 2004;Saf 2009;Eslamian and Feizi 2007;Modarres 2007;Norbiato et al 2007;Hussain and Pasha 2009;Castellarin et al 2008;Yang et al 2009) but an important aspect, in the comparison of quality of the quantile estimates obtained at each site from regional approach to that of at-site analysis, is how can we calculate the standard errors of the estimated quantiles at each site of a homogeneous region? In this paper, a relationship provided in Hosking and Wallis (1997) has been explored and standard errors of the estimated flood quantiles at each site of the homogeneous regions have been calculated by extending the results of the simulation experiments related to the accuracy measures of the regional estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k-s test and AD tests perform better than the Chi-Squared [21], with the AD deemed as more powerful as it places more emphasis on tail end of the distribution [22]. The critical values for the k-s and AD tests change based on the theoretical probability distribution considered and number of parameters being estimated, with various works [23][24][25][26] published on this matter.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the 1% flood values were not given for each site by Shentsis et al (1997), maximum observed flows for most of these sites are presented by Ben Zvi & Azmon (1997), and values for Region I are plotted on Fig. 3(a).…”
Section: Regional Distribution Of Maximum Instantaneous Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%