1977
DOI: 10.2307/2801000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joking, Affinity and the Exchange of Ritual Services Among the Kiga of Northern Rwanda: An Essay on Joking Relationship Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it also appears that aggressiveness can be overdone in ways that undermine perceived funniness (Zillmann and Bryant ; Bryant ), and there are ways of using aggressive forms of humor in order to express affection. Overtly hostile joking practices are common ways of fostering intimacy in traditional societies (Freedman ), and teasing remains a common way of cultivating closeness (Keltner et al , ; Oring ). Unsurprising, then, that Gruner was wrong about the nature of the relationship between laughter and aggression.…”
Section: The Superiority Theory: Hostility Prejudice and Shamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it also appears that aggressiveness can be overdone in ways that undermine perceived funniness (Zillmann and Bryant ; Bryant ), and there are ways of using aggressive forms of humor in order to express affection. Overtly hostile joking practices are common ways of fostering intimacy in traditional societies (Freedman ), and teasing remains a common way of cultivating closeness (Keltner et al , ; Oring ). Unsurprising, then, that Gruner was wrong about the nature of the relationship between laughter and aggression.…”
Section: The Superiority Theory: Hostility Prejudice and Shamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radcliffe-Brown's ( 1940) seminal article on joking relationships posited the existence of a social relationship in some cultures where specific individuals were obliged to engage in teasing and joking as a means of managing social conflict. Although the classic formulation of the joking relationship has been criticized on a number ofpoints (Drew, 1987;Freedman, 1977;Johnson, 1978), studies do suggest that some social roles may be important in the development of teasing. For example, sex, age, social status, marital and group membership have been variously reported as related to the content and roles involved in joking and teasing (Bradney, 1957;Handleman & Kapferer, 1972;Lundberg, I 969, Sykes, 1966;Traylor, I 973).…”
Section: Staging a Teasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of the literature on joking relationships is based on African examples (Rigby 1968;Freedman 1977;Stevens 1978;Wegru 2001), and debate has centred on the theory of joking relationships as a social mechanism for the dissipation of underlying hostility between groups or individuals who are said to be in social relationships of simultaneous conjunction and disjunction. This view is largely the result of the work of Radcliffe-Brown (1924, 1940, 1949 who, surprisingly, does not mention joking relationships in Aboriginal Australia, let alone apply his theory to the place of joking relationships in Aboriginal kinship systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%