2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/672387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jordan Higher Derivable Mappings on Rings

Abstract: LetRbe a ring. We say that a family of mapsD={dn}n∈Nis a Jordan higher derivable map (without assumption of additivity) onRifd0=IR(the identity map onR) anddn(ab+ba)=∑p+q=n‍dp(a)dq(b)+∑p+q=n‍dp(b)dq(a)hold for alla,b∈Rand for eachn∈N. In this paper, we show that every Jordan higher derivable map on a ring under certain assumptions becomes a higher derivation. As its application, we get that every Jordan higher derivable map on Banach algebra is an additive higher derivation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(m) = −mU 1 (1) − mU 2 (m) for all m ∈ M.On the similar pattern with G = 0 we find that U 2 (m) = 0 for all m ∈ M. Combining last two expressions we arrive at T 2 (m) = −mU 1(1) for all m ∈ above we can easily find that T 3 (n) = 0, ∆ 3 (n) = 0, V 3 (n) = −U 1 (1)n − U 3 (n)n and U 3 (n) = 0 for all n ∈ N. These lead to V 3 (n) = −U 1 (1)n for all n ∈ N. Now we mention a significant result of this article as follows:Theorem 4 Let S = S(A, M, N, B) be a 2-torsion free generalized matrix algebra over a commutative ring R. Then any k-semi centralizing derivation on S is zero.Proof. Let Φ be a k-semi centralizing derivation on S. Then by Lemma 2, Φ has the following form a) − mn 0 − m 0 n am 0+ T 2 (m) − m 0 b n 0 a − bn 0 + V 3 (n) U 4 (b) + nm 0 + n 0 m , where a ∈ A; b ∈ B; m, m 0 ∈ M; n, n 0 ∈ N and ∆ 1 : A → A, T 2 : M → M, V 3 : N → N, U 4 : B → B are R-linear maps satisfying condition (1) − (4)given in Lemma 2.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(m) = −mU 1 (1) − mU 2 (m) for all m ∈ M.On the similar pattern with G = 0 we find that U 2 (m) = 0 for all m ∈ M. Combining last two expressions we arrive at T 2 (m) = −mU 1(1) for all m ∈ above we can easily find that T 3 (n) = 0, ∆ 3 (n) = 0, V 3 (n) = −U 1 (1)n − U 3 (n)n and U 3 (n) = 0 for all n ∈ N. These lead to V 3 (n) = −U 1 (1)n for all n ∈ N. Now we mention a significant result of this article as follows:Theorem 4 Let S = S(A, M, N, B) be a 2-torsion free generalized matrix algebra over a commutative ring R. Then any k-semi centralizing derivation on S is zero.Proof. Let Φ be a k-semi centralizing derivation on S. Then by Lemma 2, Φ has the following form a) − mn 0 − m 0 n am 0+ T 2 (m) − m 0 b n 0 a − bn 0 + V 3 (n) U 4 (b) + nm 0 + n 0 m , where a ∈ A; b ∈ B; m, m 0 ∈ M; n, n 0 ∈ N and ∆ 1 : A → A, T 2 : M → M, V 3 : N → N, U 4 : B → B are R-linear maps satisfying condition (1) − (4)given in Lemma 2.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Further, we have [∆ 1 (a), a] k = 0, i.e., ∆ 1 is k-commuting map on A. Further, replacing a by a + 1 in [∆ 1 (a), a] k = 0, we conclude that [∆ 1 (1), a] k = 0 for all a ∈ A and hence ∆ 1 (1) ∈ Z(A) k .…”
Section: Key Contentmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a very recent paper [3], the authors have shown that every Jordan higher derivable map becomes additive with certain assumptions. However, it is still open to find the condition on a ring R under which a Jordan triple higher derivable map turns out to be a Jordan triple higher derivation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%