“…Dental nonmetric traits were used as a proxy for genetic data; these hereditary features, visible on tooth cusps and roots, have been found to recreate population distances that are similar to DNA studies (Delgado et al, 2019; Hubbard et al, 2015; Rathmann & Reyes‐Centeno, 2020). Dental non‐metric traits have been used in various biodistance investigations, ranging from global (Hanihara, 2008; Scott & Dahlberg, 1982; Scott & Turner, 1997; Stojanowski & Schillaci, 2006) and regional (Coppa et al, 2007; Irish, 2005, 2006; Irish & Friedman, 2010; Parras, 2004; Ullinger et al, 2005) to intra‐site comparisons (Adams et al, 2020; Elias, 2016; Maaranen et al, 2021; Paul et al, 2013; Pilloud & Larsen, 2011; Prevedorou & Stojanowski, 2017; Rathmann et al, 2019; Stantis, Maaranen, Kharobi, Nowell, Macpherson, Schutkowski, & Bourke, 2021; Stojanowski, 2003; Stojanowski & Schillaci, 2006). In comparison, intra‐site (i.e., intra‐cemetery) analyses are not as common though they have much potential by providing insight into cemetery structures, post‐marital residency, biological kinship, temporal microchronology and phenotypic variability (Stojanowski & Schillaci, 2006).…”