2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2005.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Josephson current at atomic scale: Tunneling and nanocontacts using a STM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The example in figure 10(a) shows that the curve with larger total conductance presents a slightly smaller zero bias peak. This behavior is very similar to the one observed in S-S nanocontacts [36], where it was seen that the value of the zero bias current depends mainly on the individual transmissions of the quantum channels, and not on the total conductance of the nanocontact. These observations are compatible with the analysis in [37], where the robustness of the Majorana signatures in high transparency situations was studied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The example in figure 10(a) shows that the curve with larger total conductance presents a slightly smaller zero bias peak. This behavior is very similar to the one observed in S-S nanocontacts [36], where it was seen that the value of the zero bias current depends mainly on the individual transmissions of the quantum channels, and not on the total conductance of the nanocontact. These observations are compatible with the analysis in [37], where the robustness of the Majorana signatures in high transparency situations was studied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Occasionally, slight atomic rearrangements at the nanocontact take place. These rearrangements are seen as variations in the conductance and the Josephson current [28,29], which can be directly related to slight changes in the conduction channel arrangements through the contact and have no influence in the behavior discussed.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the growing interest in phenomena with extremely sharp spectral features on smaller and smaller energy scales, the demand for higher and higher spectroscopic energy resolution increases. Examples are the Kondo effect 4 , Yu–Shiba–Rusinov states 5 6 , Majorana fermions 7 , or the Josephson effect 8 9 10 11 , just to name a few. Aside from the obvious strategy of lowering the temperature to increase the energy resolution 12 , superconducting tips have successfully been conducted to circumvent the broadening effects of the Fermi function in the tunnelling process and greatly improve the energy resolution 6 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%