“…Despite the progressing debate about what constitutes scholarly impact nowadays (e.g., Aguinis, Shapiro, Antonacopoulou, & Cummings, ; Osterloh & Frey, ) and corresponding criticism of academic ranking systems (e.g., Adler & Harzing, ; Renwick, Breslin, & Price, ), the traditional assessment of a journal's impact and reputation remains based on its rankings. Vogel et al () differentiate three types of rankings according to methodological approaches: (1) citation‐based rankings, (2) expert‐based rankings and (3) hybrids of the aforementioned. A comprehensive compendium of 13 journal rankings relevant to management and organization studies is published and frequently updated by Anne‐Wil Harzing on her website (), which lists CIM as one of 17 journals in the ‘innovation’ subject area.…”