2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Journal rankings in management and business studies: What rules do we play by?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
68
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Vogel et al . () provide a detailed overview of article characteristics associated with publication and citation success. Some academics argue that articles published in top‐ranked journals tend to build on pre‐existing knowledge rather than promote innovativeness.…”
Section: Analyses Of Citation Statistics and Article Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vogel et al . () provide a detailed overview of article characteristics associated with publication and citation success. Some academics argue that articles published in top‐ranked journals tend to build on pre‐existing knowledge rather than promote innovativeness.…”
Section: Analyses Of Citation Statistics and Article Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several countries, including New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom and Hong Kong, have national research assessment exercises to evaluate the quality of universities’ research outputs. Journal rankings are often used as a proxy for research quality, which influences academic performance evaluations and publication strategies (Macdonald and Kam, ; Northcott and Linacre, ; Vogel et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accordingly, many universities use the Australian Business Dean's Council (ABDC) journal ranking list as a litmus test for research quality (de Villiers and Guthrie et al, 2019). As a result, the ABDC list is seen to be one of the most biased lists for recognising qualitative research or quantitative research (Vogel et al, 2017). Hence, while there is institutional pressure to publish in the top journals, and those journals mainly use quantitative methodologies, there is no surprise that this has been reflected previously in journals aspiring to increase their performance and recognition as outlets for quality accounting and finance research.…”
Section: Methodsologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the progressing debate about what constitutes scholarly impact nowadays (e.g., Aguinis, Shapiro, Antonacopoulou, & Cummings, ; Osterloh & Frey, ) and corresponding criticism of academic ranking systems (e.g., Adler & Harzing, ; Renwick, Breslin, & Price, ), the traditional assessment of a journal's impact and reputation remains based on its rankings. Vogel et al () differentiate three types of rankings according to methodological approaches: (1) citation‐based rankings, (2) expert‐based rankings and (3) hybrids of the aforementioned. A comprehensive compendium of 13 journal rankings relevant to management and organization studies is published and frequently updated by Anne‐Wil Harzing on her website (), which lists CIM as one of 17 journals in the ‘innovation’ subject area.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%