2001
DOI: 10.1177/08861090122094190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Journeying the Quagmire: Exploring the Discourses That Shape the Qualitative Research Process

Abstract: In the struggles to have its legitimacy recognized, qualitative research has been framed as a singular entity understood in relation to quantitative research. This interpretation is now being challenged, resulting in the emergence of increasingly complex, frequently contradictory, and often unarticulated understandings of the goals and practices associated with qualitative research. This article chronicles the pragmatic and ethical struggles the author encountered as her own ideas, reflecting the developing st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other strategies that help move the researcher and participants to a more equal sharing of power are scheduling interviews at a time and location of the participant's choice, using a relatively flexible and unstructured approach to questioning so that participants assume more power over the direction of the conversation, sharing the researcher's understanding of the key issues arising and assuming an open stance towards the participant, as well as sharing personal details and answering questions asked both during the interview and afterwards 27 . The famous notion of ‘no intimacy without reciprocity’ 28 is borne out by the last point, with the researcher needing to invest his or her own personality in the research process so as to establish a more non‐hierarchical relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other strategies that help move the researcher and participants to a more equal sharing of power are scheduling interviews at a time and location of the participant's choice, using a relatively flexible and unstructured approach to questioning so that participants assume more power over the direction of the conversation, sharing the researcher's understanding of the key issues arising and assuming an open stance towards the participant, as well as sharing personal details and answering questions asked both during the interview and afterwards 27 . The famous notion of ‘no intimacy without reciprocity’ 28 is borne out by the last point, with the researcher needing to invest his or her own personality in the research process so as to establish a more non‐hierarchical relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She used an open stance that included sharing of personal details and answering questions. 23 Not only was this ethically important to us but it was also the case that some participants would not have spoken had any other stance been taken.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative scholars have long paid attention to epistemological paradigms on the basis that they dictate the ways in which data should be managed, research relationships conducted, and truth and credibility defined (Guba & Lincoln, 2005). Without a clear understanding of these issues, it is easy for researchers to get stuck in a methodological "quagmire" (O'Connor, 2001). Lacking an epistemological framework and pre-existing plan to address these design issues, SN and NK were faced with resolving them as they arose during the study.…”
Section: Discussion: a Pragmatist Middle Ground?mentioning
confidence: 99%