2010
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2010.2051426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JPEG Error Analysis and Its Applications to Digital Image Forensics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
140
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
140
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that when the size of the image patch is small, e.g., 64 × 64, the total number of DCT coefficients is small (64 coefficients in total), and it is difficult to estimate the actual distribution of the patch accurately and robustly using such limited data. In order to solve the above problem of inadequate data, the 1-D feature similar to that in [23] is adopted to differentiate between SDJPEG and SSJPEG image patches as follows: Since the SSJPEG patch has never been compressed with the block structure starting from the top-left corner of the image patch, the DCT coefficients of SSJPEG can be assumed distributed approximately as the original uncompressed image patch [8,14]. Moreover, h SS m;n f ð Þ is equivalent to the distribution of the quantization error of the (m,n)th DCT component with the quantization step q m,n .…”
Section: Detection Of Image Patch With Sdjpeg Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that when the size of the image patch is small, e.g., 64 × 64, the total number of DCT coefficients is small (64 coefficients in total), and it is difficult to estimate the actual distribution of the patch accurately and robustly using such limited data. In order to solve the above problem of inadequate data, the 1-D feature similar to that in [23] is adopted to differentiate between SDJPEG and SSJPEG image patches as follows: Since the SSJPEG patch has never been compressed with the block structure starting from the top-left corner of the image patch, the DCT coefficients of SSJPEG can be assumed distributed approximately as the original uncompressed image patch [8,14]. Moreover, h SS m;n f ð Þ is equivalent to the distribution of the quantization error of the (m,n)th DCT component with the quantization step q m,n .…”
Section: Detection Of Image Patch With Sdjpeg Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall detection performance of any JPEG-compatibility detector will necessarily strongly depend on the accuracy of the estimator of θ as well as the prior distribution of θ in the testing set. Despite some encouraging work, such as [11], we consider the problem of estimating θ as an open and quite difficult problem for the following reasons. Most JPEG images today originate in digital cameras, which, unfortunately, almost exclusively use quantization tables customized for the image content, the imaging sensor, the manufacturer's color space, and the image size [17].…”
Section: Robustness To Jpeg Compressor Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the search space may be quite large even when one considers estimating only the quantization tables themselves. Methods that estimate the individual quantization steps, such as [6,11,10], may fail for high compression ratios as there may be little or no data in the JPEG file to estimate the quantization steps for sparsely populated medium-high frequency DCT modes.…”
Section: Robustness To Jpeg Compressor Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DCT coefficient histograms of the re-compressed images are compared to that of the original image; the primary quantization table is selected as the one having minimum distance from the original DCT coefficient histogram. Following this seminal work, Luo and others [66] propose another similarity criteria based on the analysis of JPEG rounding errors. The method is shown to be more accurate than that in [63].…”
Section: Tampering Detection Independent On the Type Of Forgerymentioning
confidence: 99%