JPEG2000 for automated quantification of immunohistochemically stained cell nuclei: a comparative study with standard JPEG format

Abstract

The Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) standard format is one of the most widely used in image compression technologies. More recently, JPEG2000 format has emerged as a state-of-the-art technology that provides substantial improvements in picture quality at higher compression ratios. However, there has been no attempt to date to determine which of the two compression formats produces less variability in the automated evaluation of immunohistochemically stained digital images in agreement with their compression rates and complexity degrees. The evaluation of Ki67 and FOXP3 immunohistochemical nuclear markers was performed in a total of 329 digital images: 47 were captured in uncompressed Tagged Image File Format (TIFF), 141 were converted to three JPEG compressed formats (47 each with 1:3, 1:23 and 1:46 compression) and 141 were converted to three JPEG2000 compressed formats (47 each with 1:3, 1:23 and 1:46 compression). The count differences between images in TIFF versus JPEG formats were compared with those obtained between images in TIFF versus JPEG2000 formats at the three levels of compression. It was found that, using JPEG2000 compression, the results of the stained nuclei count are close enough to the results obtained with uncompressed images, especially in highly complex images at minimum and medium compression. Otherwise, in images of low complexity, JPEG and JPEG2000 had similar count efficiency to that of the original TIFF images at all compression levels. These data suggest that JPEG2000 could give rise to an efficient means of storage, reducing file size and storage capacity, without compromise on the immunohistochemical analytical quality.

Extracellular matrix composition defines an ultra-high-risk group of neuroblastoma within the high-risk patient cohort

“…For the remaining elements, individual images of every sample were exported from the whole-slide scanned image to two computer programs: (1) angiopath ( Fernandez-Carrobles et al , 2013 ; Tadeo et al , 2016 ), which then closed vessels with incomplete vascular walls to properly quantify the vascular density and to measure variations in the shape and size of the vessels; and (2) Image-Pro Plus 6.0, which enabled proper segmentation of Col I Fs and provided parameters indicating various morphological features of the Ret Fs networks. JPEG format, with the highest quality compression, was chosen by default as being sufficient to detect image hues without loss of quality, given that the majority of the morphological measurements are not affected by compression ( Lopez et al , 2008 ; Lopez et al , 2009 ; Lejeune et al , 2011 ). Nevertheless, we chose TIFF format for blood-vessel analysis because we needed fine segmentation (precise recognition of the elements of interest) to properly perform blood-vessel closing, which is one of the central advantages of the software used.…”

Vascular patterns provide therapeutic targets in aggressive neuroblastic tumors

“…NB NOS samples have also been quantified (n=41, 9%). Various techniques were performed to assess the status of the MYCN oncogene: MNNA (n=379, 82.8%) vs. MNA (n=77, 16.8%), the integrity of the 11q23 region: non-deleted (n=321, 70.1%) vs. 11qD (n=77, 16.8%) and the overall genomic profile: numerical chromosomal aberrations (n=95, 20.7%) vs. SCA (n=223, 48.7%), following previously published European guidelines [ 35 - 39 ]. The combination of all the above histopathological and genetic variables with age: <18 months (n=266, 58.1%) vs. >18 months (n=172, 37.6%); and stage: localized 1 (n=145, 31.6%), localized 2 (n=143, 31.4%), metastatic (n=112, 24.4%) and metastatic special (n=32, 6.9%); according to the INRG classification, defined a risk group: very low (n=184, 37.6%), low (n=77, 37.6%), intermediate (n=34, 37.6%), unspecified low or intermediate (some data missing) (n=24, 5.3%) and high (n=110, 37.6%) (Figure 4 ) [ 2 ].…”

The influence of the microscope lamp filament colour temperature on the process of digital images of histological slides acquisition standardization

“…Unfortunately, any manipulation can decrease image quality in terms of colour fidelity (called also colour consistency), overall and local contrast, homogeneousness in luminance across the image, over-and underexposure, and sharpness [ 2 ]. The degrading of image is similar to effects of image compression [ 3 ]. Image features variation leads to ambiguity in contour and texture detection, thus influence reliability and effectiveness of image segmentation and image quantitative description [ 4 ].…”