2015 34th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/sccc.2015.7416572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JSpIRIT: a flexible tool for the analysis of code smells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevance of our idea and concrete solution have been recognized by the software engineering community. We published our results in three international conferences [Oizumi et al 2016] (Qualis A1), [Vidal et al 2015], and [Vidal et al 2016]; a symposium [Oizumi et al 2014a]; an international journal ; and a workshop [Oizumi et al 2014b, Albuquerque et al 2014. Awards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of our idea and concrete solution have been recognized by the software engineering community. We published our results in three international conferences [Oizumi et al 2016] (Qualis A1), [Vidal et al 2015], and [Vidal et al 2016]; a symposium [Oizumi et al 2014a]; an international journal ; and a workshop [Oizumi et al 2014b, Albuquerque et al 2014. Awards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[70] and [143] instead present solutions for detecting smells in the design of a single service (specified in UML and ARCHERY, respectively). [9], [67] and [159] focus on identifying smells in the structuring of the sources of a service, and propose refactorings for resolving detected smells. All such approaches however differ from ours, as they focus on the design of a single service, while our approach focuses on the architectural smells due to the interactions among all components forming a microservice-based application.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers presenting code smell detection strategies are listed by Sharma and Spinellis [7]. Among the classified detection methods there are also strategies based on software metrics, like [32][33][34][35]. However, again, studies focus on the identification of code smells using manually defined code smell detection rules.…”
Section: Research Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most known code smells are Brain Class, God Class, Brain Method and Feature Envy presented by Lanza and Marinescu [16]. They also present identification rules and some of them are implemented in Jdeodorand [36] and JSpIRIT [34]. The results of the conducted identification presented in [12], shows that the intersection between identified entities, using different detection methods and/or tools, is very small.…”
Section: Research Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%