1968
DOI: 10.1037/h0026114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judged prognosis for functional psychosis disorder classifications: A prothetic continuum.

Abstract: Psychiatrists were asked to judge the prognostic favorabilities associated with IS psychosis-disorder classifications using magnitude and category rating scale procedures. The prognosis judgments behaved, with 2 criteria, as based on a prothetic continuum. The developed magnitude and category scales were seen to be highly related to previously published judged prognosis scales.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series of experiments, Stone investigated the relationship between psychiatrists' judgments and prognostic favorability, using magnitude estimates. In the first study, Stone and Skurdal (1968) sought evidence of the applicability of the power law to prognostic judgments by having 13 psychiatrist judges assess prognosis by using a 7-point category scale. When these data were plotted against magnitude estimates, they yielded the typical downward concavity similar in form to that obtained for brightness, loudness, and other sensory functions in Stevens's psychophysical research.…”
Section: Psychological Assessment and Medical Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of experiments, Stone investigated the relationship between psychiatrists' judgments and prognostic favorability, using magnitude estimates. In the first study, Stone and Skurdal (1968) sought evidence of the applicability of the power law to prognostic judgments by having 13 psychiatrist judges assess prognosis by using a 7-point category scale. When these data were plotted against magnitude estimates, they yielded the typical downward concavity similar in form to that obtained for brightness, loudness, and other sensory functions in Stevens's psychophysical research.…”
Section: Psychological Assessment and Medical Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%