1957
DOI: 10.1037/h0042054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judgments of leadership based upon physiognomic cues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their premises about the relation between movement behavior and admission/discharge, however, were wrong. Wallbott's findings concurred with earlier interpretation experiments that unanimously revealed that untrained raters made incorrect judgments about participants' personalities on the basis of observation of gait or on photographs (Eisenberg & Reichline, 1939;Mason, 1957). In this line of research, Frijda (1965) underlined that it was not only important to understand the principles of the meaning of expression but also to explore the principles of the assessment of expression.…”
Section: The Bidirectional Link Between Movement Form and Movement Fusupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Their premises about the relation between movement behavior and admission/discharge, however, were wrong. Wallbott's findings concurred with earlier interpretation experiments that unanimously revealed that untrained raters made incorrect judgments about participants' personalities on the basis of observation of gait or on photographs (Eisenberg & Reichline, 1939;Mason, 1957). In this line of research, Frijda (1965) underlined that it was not only important to understand the principles of the meaning of expression but also to explore the principles of the assessment of expression.…”
Section: The Bidirectional Link Between Movement Form and Movement Fusupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The naïve raters agreed more among each other than with the dominance rating based upon a questionnaire (Eisenberg, 1937). Similar findings were reported by Mason (1957). 24 untrained raters were asked to judge leadership qualities of 75 candidates based on photographs.…”
Section: Naïve Raters Base Their Judgements On Wrong Premisessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…To summarize, the results of the studies by Eisenberg and Reichline (1939), Mason (1957), and Wallbott (1989) evidence that naïve raters deviate from external objective criteria when assessing personality traits or psychopathology based on movement behaviour. In particular, Wallbott demonstrated that the na-ïve raters "were not 'wildly guessing' " (p. 142) but that they systematically employed specific criteria to assess whether the movement behaviour was from the admission interview or the discharge one.…”
Section: Naïve Raters Base Their Judgements On Wrong Premisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interpretation experiments unanimously reveal that naïve raters may agree in their interpretations on movement behaviour, e.g. judging a person's dominance by observing his / her gait, these judgements, however, are wrong with regard to an objective measure (Eisenberg and Reichline, 1939;Mason, 1957;. Therefore, Frijda (1965) proposed that understanding the laws of the assessment of an expression is at least as important as the laws how meaning is expressed (for a detailed discussion see Chapter 12).…”
Section: Some Common Shortcomings In Movement Behaviour Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning of the last century, Darwin's thoughts and the ideas of the Renaissance had a revival in the expression psychology (e.g. Klages, 1926;Allport & Vernon, 1933;Eisenberg, 1937;Eisenberg & Reichline, 1939;Buytendijk, 1956;Mason, 1957). Physiognomonics, facial expression, gesture, posture, gait, voice, and handwriting were interpreted as expression of affective states or personality (for a more detailed review see Asendorpf & Wallbott, 1982).…”
Section: Cologne August 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%