1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-4944(84)80001-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judgments of photographs vs. field observations in studies of perception and judgment of the visual environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of group means for the views studied showed consistently high positive correlations (averaging about 0.90) between on-site ratings of scenic beauty and ratings by the same hikers based on colour prints mailed to their homes several months later. These results are supported by Stewart et al (1984) who also found that landscape quality assessments based on photographic information closely matched assessments based on direct landscape experience.…”
Section: Evaluating Landscape Benefitssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparisons of group means for the views studied showed consistently high positive correlations (averaging about 0.90) between on-site ratings of scenic beauty and ratings by the same hikers based on colour prints mailed to their homes several months later. These results are supported by Stewart et al (1984) who also found that landscape quality assessments based on photographic information closely matched assessments based on direct landscape experience.…”
Section: Evaluating Landscape Benefitssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Daniel and Vining, 1983;Stewart et. al., 1984;Garcia Perez, 2002) and, to a limited extent, in environmental valuation studies (e.g.…”
Section: Evaluating Landscape Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of praxis, these results may be applied to the design and development of systems that support visually guided behavior or visual monitoring (Stewart, Middleton, Downton, & Ely, 1984). With such systems, it is often desirable to present visual displays with the widest possible area of view, allowing the user to scan the simulated environment more naturally (Patterson, Buede, Kraft, & Mitchell, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Hammond (1972) concluded that formal situational sampling is "clearly feasible," and he advocated that until technological advances allowed substantive situational sampling, researchers should use formal situational sampling (Hammond, 1966). Nowadays, computers, film, and tape are readily available and can be effectively used to capture and reproduce environments (e.g., P. N. Juslin, 1997;Shaw & Gifford, 1994;Stewart, Middleton, Downton, & Ely, 1984). In sum, whereas Brunswik proposed sampling real stimuli from the environment, Hammond (1966) advocated creating stimuli that were representative in terms of the formal informational properties of the environment.…”
Section: After Brunswik: Hammond's Interpretation Of Representative Dmentioning
confidence: 99%