Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Federalism is a constitutionalized version of multi-tier governance. Proponents of veto-player theory argue that a high number of veto players leads to a high degree of policy stability. Compared to states with a unitary structure, federal countries, in which at least one sub-central level of government is constitutionally recognized and endowed with some degree of exclusive competences, dispose of a higher number of veto players, who can voice and challenge constitutional non-compliance by the central government. In this paper, we therefore ask whether federally constituted states also enjoy a higher degree of constitutional compliance, i.e. have governments that respect and enforce the promises made in their country’s constitution. At the same time, with a higher number of governments under federalism, there are more chances that some of them will not comply with constitutional constraints leading to greater non-compliance. To test these hypotheses, we employ data from up to 163 countries and apply standard panel data estimation techniques. Our results indicate that federalism is neither positively nor negatively correlated with constitutional compliance of the respective countries.
Federalism is a constitutionalized version of multi-tier governance. Proponents of veto-player theory argue that a high number of veto players leads to a high degree of policy stability. Compared to states with a unitary structure, federal countries, in which at least one sub-central level of government is constitutionally recognized and endowed with some degree of exclusive competences, dispose of a higher number of veto players, who can voice and challenge constitutional non-compliance by the central government. In this paper, we therefore ask whether federally constituted states also enjoy a higher degree of constitutional compliance, i.e. have governments that respect and enforce the promises made in their country’s constitution. At the same time, with a higher number of governments under federalism, there are more chances that some of them will not comply with constitutional constraints leading to greater non-compliance. To test these hypotheses, we employ data from up to 163 countries and apply standard panel data estimation techniques. Our results indicate that federalism is neither positively nor negatively correlated with constitutional compliance of the respective countries.
The aim of the article is to develop a common understanding of the content of judicial immunity and thus to generate a theory on the application of this legal institution in ensuring and balancing judicial independence and accountability. Neither the separation of powers nor the judicial independence precludes the assessment of a judge’s responsibility for violation of the law, however, it is in the interests of both the state and society to ensure the independent exercise of the judicial function. Therefore, there is a need to strike a balance between the independent exercise of the judicial function and the holding of judges accountable. This balance is ensured by judicial immunity. The research was carried out by using the methods of scientific research customary in legal science: literature studies, analytical, comparative, inductive and deductive research methods. The study reveals the aim of judicial immunity, describes its content focusing on two elements of the judicial immunity: non-liability and inviolability and reveals the specific requirements of judicial immunity. The study confirms that well-regulated and responsibly applied judicial immunity ensures that independence and accountability can be balanced.
The article provides comprehensive overview of the diverse landscape of supreme courts across Europe, offering insights into varying structures and functions they embody across different countries. It analyses supreme courts as the only supreme judicial institution or as a part of a broader supreme court system alongside supreme administrative court and/or constitutional courts. The article highlights the diversity in organization of supreme justice and offers a glimpse into a larger project on comparative supreme justice, indicating in-depth analysis of various factors such as the position of supreme courts in different states, recruitment process and the courts’ competencies on the European scale. The article provides valuable insights into the complex and multifaceted nature of supreme courts in Europe. Its approach to presenting specific examples enables a deeper understanding of the topic, making it a useful resource for readers interested in comparative legal systems and judicial structures in different countries. The paper identifies impact of filter model on a Supreme Court’s workload and efficiency of the Court, as well as on the structure. Furthermore, it refers to possible shortcomings of filter model and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in that regard.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.