2015
DOI: 10.1111/lapo.12046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judicial Responsiveness to Valence Issues: An Event History Analysis of the Initial Sex Offender Registration and Notification (SORN) Laws

Abstract: Under what conditions does judicial responsiveness to the public's policy preferences compromise the court's role as a countermajoritarian institution? Scholars have yet to examine whether and how quickly state appellate court justices respond to valence issues. This study investigates the relationship between retention elections and judicial responsiveness to the initial sex offender registration and notification (SORN) laws popularized in the 1990s. Findings show that judges who participated in nonpartisan r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The policy institutions identified in the social work literature as arenas for policyrelated activities have all been the subject of studies adopting a neo-institutional perspective. These include the legislature (Auel and Christiansen 2015;Blomgren and Rozenberg 2012;Papp and Russo 2018), the judicial system (Easterly 2016;Lindquist 2017), and the executive branch (Madama 2013). Close examination of the workings of these institutions over time reveals the factors that lead to institutional change and the ways in which the structure and internal workings of institutions, at a given period in time, influence the policy formulation process and the results of this process.…”
Section: Institutions and Policy Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The policy institutions identified in the social work literature as arenas for policyrelated activities have all been the subject of studies adopting a neo-institutional perspective. These include the legislature (Auel and Christiansen 2015;Blomgren and Rozenberg 2012;Papp and Russo 2018), the judicial system (Easterly 2016;Lindquist 2017), and the executive branch (Madama 2013). Close examination of the workings of these institutions over time reveals the factors that lead to institutional change and the ways in which the structure and internal workings of institutions, at a given period in time, influence the policy formulation process and the results of this process.…”
Section: Institutions and Policy Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%