Judicial Review of Regulatory Impact Analysis: Why Not the Best?

Bull, Reeve T.; Ellig, Jerry

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3191363

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Judicial review of RIAs, and their use in regulatory decisions, is also a bigger factor in the United States than in Europe (Bull and Ellig, 2017). Regulatory Impact Assessments in the EU rarely play a role in litigation after a regulation is adopted but in the US RIAs are often considered in judicial review of a final regulation (Cecot and Viscusi, 2014).…”

Section: Comparing Regulatory Impact Assessment Requirements In Europ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Benefit-Cost Analysis of Air Pollution, Energy, and Climate Regulations

Krutilla

Graham

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This element offers a review and synthesis of the research on economic methods for evaluating regulations that improve air quality, save energy, and reduce climate risks. The intended audience is regulators and other constituencies interested in the nexus between scholarship and practice; analysts in government agencies and research organizations; and academic scholars and their graduate students. Topics include the evolution of regulatory impact assessment in the OECD; cost estimation, including engineering, partial equilibrium, and general equilibrium approaches; benefit valuation, with an emphasis on the value of reducing risk of illness and premature mortality, and methods for pricing carbon emissions; discounting methods, and their relationship to carbon pricing; the distribution of regulatory costs and benefits; and uncertainty evaluation methods for addressing less and more fundamental uncertainty. Perspective on the relevance and limitations of current research is offered. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

show abstract

Section: Comparing Regulatory Impact Assessment Requirements In Europ...mentioning

confidence: 99%