2013
DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2013.847757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jugād: Youth and Enterprise in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Motion said: ‘ Leo ni leo, kesho ni baadaye [‘Today is today, and tomorrow is later’ in Swahili], and you don't think of tomorrow because you are scared.’ The struggle between the hustler and the fool centres on the courage to imagine a (better) future. A hustler, as Kingi put it, ‘has to stay alert and focused [ kukaa rada in Sheng ] and take opportunities’ to build tomorrow (see also Vigh 2011; Jeffrey and Young 2014), whereas the group members persistently emphasized that they had no power to change their situation because there were no opportunities. However, this, the current baze members claimed, did not mean that they were fools.…”
Section: Hustlers and Foolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion said: ‘ Leo ni leo, kesho ni baadaye [‘Today is today, and tomorrow is later’ in Swahili], and you don't think of tomorrow because you are scared.’ The struggle between the hustler and the fool centres on the courage to imagine a (better) future. A hustler, as Kingi put it, ‘has to stay alert and focused [ kukaa rada in Sheng ] and take opportunities’ to build tomorrow (see also Vigh 2011; Jeffrey and Young 2014), whereas the group members persistently emphasized that they had no power to change their situation because there were no opportunities. However, this, the current baze members claimed, did not mean that they were fools.…”
Section: Hustlers and Foolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silva’s (2011) study of highway franchises in Chile demonstrates how improvisation resulting from economic liberalisation reinforces the power of the state through a lack of accountability, while falling most heavily on the most vulnerable communities. Where ordinary people improvise in this mode, it is out of need, with improvisation often forced upon them by a neoliberal state that has withdrawn infrastructures and safety nets and encourages individual entrepreneurialism (Jeffrey and Young, 2014; McFarlane, 2011). This mode of improvisation tends to cement existing structures rather than challenge or re-interpret them.…”
Section: Three Modes Of Urban Improvisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in contrast to contemporary entrepreneurship, jugaad has been seen as a domain of the marginal, even subaltern, subject. For example, Jeffrey and Young () place jugaad in the context of a larger informal economy where unemployed young men often take the role of “fixers,” hustlers, and brokers for actors embedded within formal enterprises. Their position outside the formal economy makes circumvention of laws inevitable, and the term jugaad often serves as a euphemism for this corruption.…”
Section: Being Entrepreneurial In India: From Postcolonial To (Neo)limentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the ordinary masses (rather than expert scientists or engineers) were seen as a resource of wealth creation for the nation‐state. As more and more previously reserved sectors were opened up to private, foreign capital, state policies gradually began to incorporate jugaad into the discourse of the “new India.” Ordinary Indians were called on to use their latent jugaad skills to alleviate the vast socioeconomic inequalities and “catch up” with the socioeconomic elites (Jeffrey and Young ; Kaur ). In this context, the lack of affordable and accessible public services created “an ideal laboratory condition within which a culture of innovation takes birth” (Kaur , 313).…”
Section: Being Entrepreneurial In India: From Postcolonial To (Neo)limentioning
confidence: 99%