1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5273(95)02550-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jugular venous pressure and pulse wave form in the diagnosis of right ventricular infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in our study specificity was 95. 24% and sensitivity was 64%, and these results were supported by Mittal et al (1996), who reported that raised jugular venous pressure had high specificity (96.8%) but low sensitivity (39%) in diagnosing RV infarction [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in our study specificity was 95. 24% and sensitivity was 64%, and these results were supported by Mittal et al (1996), who reported that raised jugular venous pressure had high specificity (96.8%) but low sensitivity (39%) in diagnosing RV infarction [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The in-hospital mortality rate for IWMI with RV infarction is 31% compared to 6% in IWMI without RVMI [12]. The mortality of cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular infarction (55%) was comparable to that due to left ventricular infarction (59%) in spite of patients being younger and having a higher incidence of single vessel disease [13]. Observational studies have suggested that early reperfusion in inferior wall MI with RV infarction is beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At the time of presentation, there were no significant differences in hemodynamics, left ventricular, ejection fraction, and RV dimension between patients with proximal and distal RCA lesions. This can be explained by the fact that RVMI can lead to various degrees of myocardial ischemia and does not always lead to hemodynamic impairment [28], [29]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in RVSP derived from TR between patients with proximal versus distal RCA stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the atrial perfusion is not compromised, the a-wave and x descend waveforms of the JVP are enhanced but y descent is blunted due to pandiastolic RV dysfunction, giving rise to a ‘W’ pattern waveform 47–49. In patients with associated RA infarction, the RA and central venous pressures are higher but with depressed a-wave, and x and y descent, forming an ‘M’ pattern 48. Dilatation of the RV may lead to functional tricuspid regurgitation such that the RA pressure tracing reveals a systolic wave that precedes and may fuse with the venous filling wave 50.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Rvmimentioning
confidence: 99%