Handbook of Volatility Models and Their Applications 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118272039.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where MN denotes a standard mixed normal distribution, and variance. This fact has also been remarked in the paper of Mancini and Calvori (2012).…”
Section: The Case J =supporting
confidence: 72%
“…where MN denotes a standard mixed normal distribution, and variance. This fact has also been remarked in the paper of Mancini and Calvori (2012).…”
Section: The Case J =supporting
confidence: 72%
“…For a summary see e.g. Mancini & Calvori (2012). So even if the FIEGARCH process could well approximate the true underlying volatility, it is important to study the jump process and use the additional information for forecasts improvement.…”
Section: Fiegarch-jump Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) and J t ; t = 1, 2, ..., T is a Jump process modeled as a sum of intraday jumps, whereas the number of intraday jumps in one day follows a Poisson process with parameter λ = 0.028 and their size is drawn from a normal distribution N (0, 0.2). The Jump process is based on Mancini & Calvori (2012), with parameters slightly adjusted (originally λ = 0.014 and sizes follow N (0, 0.25) ) based on analysis of resulting simulations and comparison with real data. Moreover, unlike in the previous Monte Carlo experiment, a non-zero constant is assumed.…”
Section: Fiegarch-jump Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing for jumps and precisely identifying their occurrences is of overwhelming importance in finance since jumps have implications in risk management, portfolio allocation and derivatives pricing (Aït-Sahalia, 2004). Several tests have been proposed in the literature (see Mancini and Calvori, 2012 for a survey). The most popular test is probably the test for finite activity jumps 4 proposed independently by Andersen et al (2007) and Lee and Mykland (2008, LM08 hereafter) and extended by Lee and Mykland (2012, LM12 hereafter) to account for the presence of microstructure noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%