2011
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.05304-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Junín Virus Infects Mouse Cells and Induces Innate Immune Responses

Abstract: Junín virus is the causative agent for Argentine hemorrhagic fever, and its natural host is the New World rodent Calomys musculinus. The virus is transmitted to humans by aerosolization, and it is believed that many of the clinical symptoms are caused by cytokines produced by sentinel cells of the immune system. Here we used the Junín virus vaccine strain Candid 1 to determine whether mouse cells could be used to study virus entry and antiviral innate immune responses. We show that Candid 1 can infect and prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, only MMTV and not Junín infection was affected by TFR1 knockdown (Fig. S12A), as we previously reported (32). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, only MMTV and not Junín infection was affected by TFR1 knockdown (Fig. S12A), as we previously reported (32). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Junín virus can infect mouse cells via a TfR1-independent mechanism, albeit inefficiently compared to human cells (32, 34). Knockdown of CACNA1S or CACNA2D2 greatly decreased infection of mouse macrophage cells by both Junín and MMTV pseudotypes (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VeroE6 and HEK293T cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. The Candid-1 vaccine strain of JUNV was kindly provided by Robert B. Tesh (University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX) via Susan R. Ross (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) and was propagated in VeroE6 cells as described previously (14). The antisera used included a monoclonal anti-Flag antiserum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), a monoclonal anti-JUNV-GP antiserum QC03-BF11 (BEI Resources, Manassas, VA), a monoclonal anti-Tsg101 antiserum (Clone C2; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), a rabbit polyclonal anti-EBOV VP40 antiserum described previously (15), and a monoclonal antiactin antiserum (Sigma-Aldrich).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first TLR2 agonists identified were bacterial lipoproteins (3). In practice, TLR2 has been reported to recognize a wider range of pathogens than any other TLR, including fungi (4), protozoans (5), worms (6), Mycoplasma (7), Gram-positive and -negative bacteria (8,9), DNA viruses (10), and RNA viruses (11), as well as host molecules such as HMGB1 (12). However, concern is growing that many reported TLR2 agonists are artifacts of possible contamination, cellular debris, or merely molecules that sensitize cells to be activated by authentic TLR2 agonists (13,14).…”
Section: Importancementioning
confidence: 99%