2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29680-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jurassic Uplift Along the Huincul Arch and Its Consequences in the Stratigraphy of the Cuyo and Lotena Groups. Neuquén Basin, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the light of measured paleocurrent directions in both areas having northward to north northwestward sediment transport direction (Gugliotta et al, 2015; Olariu et al, 2020), it is likely that La Jardinera was slightly more proximal and lay slightly closer to the basin margin than Bajada de los Molles. We suggest therefore that the basal Lajas formation at Bajada de los Molles is likely to be early Aalenian, consistent with dating of Zavala (Zavala, 1996a, 1996b) and with McIlroy et al (2005). The sedimentology of Lajas Formation has probably been researched more often around Bajada de Los Molles than at any other location in the Neuquén Basin.…”
Section: Analysis Of Lajas Formation In Five Study Areassupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the light of measured paleocurrent directions in both areas having northward to north northwestward sediment transport direction (Gugliotta et al, 2015; Olariu et al, 2020), it is likely that La Jardinera was slightly more proximal and lay slightly closer to the basin margin than Bajada de los Molles. We suggest therefore that the basal Lajas formation at Bajada de los Molles is likely to be early Aalenian, consistent with dating of Zavala (Zavala, 1996a, 1996b) and with McIlroy et al (2005). The sedimentology of Lajas Formation has probably been researched more often around Bajada de Los Molles than at any other location in the Neuquén Basin.…”
Section: Analysis Of Lajas Formation In Five Study Areassupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The Lajas Formation is a Lower‐Middle Jurassic, post‐rift interval developed in a back‐arc basin, <500 m thick (Gulisano et al, 1984; Legarreta & Uliana, 1996; Veiga et al, 2013; Vergani et al, 1995; Zavala, 1993, 1996a) but with local depocenters up to 1000 m thick (e.g., southern flank of Huincul Arch, Kim et al, 2014). The Lajas Formation, representing the topsets of Cuyo Group basin‐margin clinoforms (Figure 1a), consists of fluvial, marginal marine, shallow‐marine and shelf‐edge deposits (Olariu et al, 2020; Paim et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Zavala et al (2006), periods of marine disconnection are usually associated with regional unconformities defined by sharp lithologic contacts between continental and marine deposits. Locally, angular unconformities can be recognized at the boundary between major sequences, thus suggesting some tectonic overprint (Zavala et al 2020). Groeber (1946) recognized three main transgressive-regressive sedimentary cycles: Jurásico, Ándico, and Riográndico.…”
Section: The Neuquén Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cuyo Group starts with offshore to prodeltaic marine shales and turbidites of the Los Molles Formation (Weaver 1931), a thick, organic-rich unit (1-5% TOC, Chebli et al 2011) originally interpreted as deposited in a deep-marine environment characterized by euxinic bottom waters. More recently, Zavala et al (2014Zavala et al ( , 2020, based on facies analysis, reinterpreted these deposits as a complete suite of offshore to prodelta deposits, which are in part the result of muddy hyperpycnal flows. The Los Molles Formation is transitionally overlain by a thick succession of shelfal to shallow-marine sandstones and conglomerates of the Lajas Formation (Weaver 1931).…”
Section: The Neuquén Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%