1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1973.tb01381.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jurors and Their Verdicts

Abstract: individual's verdict was recorded, both before discussion and after its complchion. Each juror then snswered a questionnaire which, amongst other things, asked about personal responses to the trial. By repeating the procedure numerous times we were able to establish not just the reaction of one jury to one trial, but the reactions of a considerable number of jurors sitting with their fellows to hear the same trial. This is the unique advantage, whatever its other artifices, of the experimental approach. The ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defendant characteristics affect witness credibility and verdicts in cases involving adult witnesses (Saks & Hastie, 1979). For example, priorconviction information causes jurors to be more conviction prone (Clary & Shaffer, 1985;Kalven & Zeisel, 1966;Myers, 1979) and discredits much of a defendant's testimony (Shaffer, 1985), especially when past crimes are similar to the crime in question (Sealy & Cornish, 1973). Negative character testimony is especially biasing if other forms of evidence are lacking or unconvincing (Kaplan, 1985), a common situation in child sexual abuse cases (Whitcomb, Shapiro, & Stellwagen, 1985).…”
Section: Defendant Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defendant characteristics affect witness credibility and verdicts in cases involving adult witnesses (Saks & Hastie, 1979). For example, priorconviction information causes jurors to be more conviction prone (Clary & Shaffer, 1985;Kalven & Zeisel, 1966;Myers, 1979) and discredits much of a defendant's testimony (Shaffer, 1985), especially when past crimes are similar to the crime in question (Sealy & Cornish, 1973). Negative character testimony is especially biasing if other forms of evidence are lacking or unconvincing (Kaplan, 1985), a common situation in child sexual abuse cases (Whitcomb, Shapiro, & Stellwagen, 1985).…”
Section: Defendant Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jury research in Canada is just beginning. It would appear that the most fruitful course for such research lies in the directions undertaken by Sealy and Cornish (4, 14) in Great Britain and Kalven and Zeisel (8) in the U.S. 4 P. Shaver in private correspondence with the authors. Dr. R. L. Gould, a psychiatrist in California, has also shared with the authors the experience of a jury selection team at the Pentagon Papers trial where the judge allowed only limited voir dire.…”
Section: Results Indicate That Lawyers Do Base Their Decisions For Jumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent British study tested the relationship between social characteristics and juror verdicts. Sealy and Cornish (14) found only one statistically significant relationship between verdict to acquit and age, with younger and older jurors more willing to acquit than middle-aged jurors. Sex, occupation, social status, and education did not have an effect upon the verdict.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a few years, U.S. Supreme Court rulings would uphold the constitutionality of majority verdicts and juries smaller than 12 jurors in state courts. Scholars in both countries were just beginning to use empirical methods to study these changes and other questions about their jury systems (Kalven and Zeisel 1966;Sealy and Cornish 1973). However, their relevance to Canadian juries had not been established.…”
Section: Jury Research In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%