“Just because he's black”: Identity construction and racial humour in a German U-19 football team

Abstract

The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP URL' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Dialogicality and Racialized Discourse in TESOL Recruitment

“…While it may be argued that humor served to defuse racial tension by bringing together group members who had previously sparred over the issue, research on racial humor has also remarked that it ultimately also serves to perpetuate existing divides (see e.g. Winkler Reid, 2015; Wolfers et al., 2017). In this case, it might be argued that the injection of levity into the discourse served to normalize racial inequalities and thus delegitimize efforts by other group members to highlight them.…”

That match was “a bit like losing your virginity”. Failed humour, face and identity construction in TV interviews with professional athletes and coaches

“…Given these group-specific norms and practices of appropriately using (and responding to) humour, it is thus perhaps not surprising that humour seems to occur more frequently in relatively private interactions among interlocutors who know each other fairly well, such as friends, family members, colleagues, or members of the same sports team (e.g. Hall & Sereno 2010;Bell 2015;Wolfers et al 2017). Doing humour among acquaintances and intimates is thus less risky than using humour towards strangers (see also Bell 2009a).…”

‘He's got Jheri curls and Tims on’: Humour and indexicality as resources for authentication in young men's talk about hair and fashion style

“…The understanding that identities are always constructed in relation to others is central to social constructionist identity theory, captured in Bucholtz and Hall's (2005) "relationality principle", and underpins some of the recent work on humour and identity (e.g. Holmes and Marra 2002;Schnurr 2009;Wolfers, File and Schnurr 2017).…”

“…Research on conversational humour and identity at times explores both discourse style and content (Schnurr 2009;Wolfers et al 2017), though analyses tend to be more heavily weighted towards the former. Holmes and Marra (2002) distinguish a range of different types of humour, from supportive to contestive, and styles of humour, from collaborative to competitive and single to extended contributions.…”