'Just do it': An analysis of accounts of control over health amongst lower socioeconomic status groups

Abstract

Recent interest in health inequalities research has focused upon psychosocial factors such as a sense of control. Previous work has sought to measure or describe personal beliefs about control over health without addressing the contradictory and rhetorical dimensions of such accounts. These issues are explored through an analysis of interviews with 30 lower socioeconomic status (SES) participants drawn from two qualitative studies of health inequalities. Key findings concern the rhetorical construction and interweaving of two contrasting positions regarding control over health: fatalism and positive thought. Fatalistic talk provided a means by which participants acknowledged their limited control over health, although not in an exclusively negative manner. Talk about thinking positively enabled participants to present themselves as having agency in the face of adversity. The creative interweaving of these two positions in accounts of control over health enabled participants to navigate the moral imperative of responsibility for health in the context of adverse and capricious circumstance. By foregrounding the social character of accounts of control the significance of moral and ethical dimensions for health inequalities research and practice are highlighted.

Fatalism and short‐termism as cultural barriers to cardiac rehabilitation among underprivileged men

“…All of this has been linked to the adoption of anti‐normative lifestyles (Bolam et al . , Davison et al . , Richards et al .…”

“…Underprivileged groups, more than others, tend to de‐emphasise illness prevention as part of their overall health regimen while focusing on more urgent factors over which they feel they have more control and that are perceived to enhance their wellbeing, such as financial stability (Bolam et al . , Davison et al . , , Richards et al .…”

Social class differences in the accounts of smoking – striving for distinction?

“…‘Healthy’ also defines what is considered to be normal and good, and accordingly, health‐related talk is deeply, morally charged ( e.g . Bolam et al . 2003).…”

“Bringing us back to our origin”: adapting and transferring an Indigenous Australian values-based leadership capacity-building course for community development in Papua New Guinea

“…These tapped into their innate capacity for resilience, motivation and control and their social and cultural values. Giving attention to psychosocial factors has been criticised as a retreat from the structural causes of health inequalities, thus leading to individualised explanations and reactionary social policy (Bolam, Hodgetts, Chamberlain, Murphy, & Gleeson, 2003). But the impact of the program went beyond personal empowerment by improving the confidence and capacity of the health leaders to enact grassroots improvements in relation to everyday, informal family workplace and community issues and systems through the experiential process of facilitating topics.…”