2019
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1588358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Just keep silent… Defensive silence as a reaction to successive structural reforms

Abstract: Employees frequently have ideas and opinions on the execution of tasks or on the organization itself. Yet, sometimes employees remain silent and withhold this valuable input from their organizations because they fear experiencing conflict or controversy, causing both performance and employee morale to suffer. This article tests to what extent such fear of speaking up, referred to as 'defensive silence,' is affected by the extent of successive structural reforms an organization endures. Analyses of Norwegian St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such attitudes may distract their attention from activities and goals that could otherwise instill an awareness of organizational problems and challenges. Furthermore, this type of behavior may rob them of any opportunity to make unique contributions, thereby hampering their creativity in organizational settings (Amabile, 1996;Wynen et al, 2020). In other words, employees' reluctance to voice their suggestions may hinder the generation of useful and novel insights that could, in normal circumstances, help improve products/services and processes and offer novel ways of solving problems at work (Muñoz-Pascual and Galende, 2017).…”
Section: Mediating Role Of Defensive Silencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such attitudes may distract their attention from activities and goals that could otherwise instill an awareness of organizational problems and challenges. Furthermore, this type of behavior may rob them of any opportunity to make unique contributions, thereby hampering their creativity in organizational settings (Amabile, 1996;Wynen et al, 2020). In other words, employees' reluctance to voice their suggestions may hinder the generation of useful and novel insights that could, in normal circumstances, help improve products/services and processes and offer novel ways of solving problems at work (Muñoz-Pascual and Galende, 2017).…”
Section: Mediating Role Of Defensive Silencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, organizational silence is harmful not only to the employees, but also to the organization and to individuals. Some have noted that the most common and widespread causes are the organizational climate, the organizational culture, unfair treatment, lack of confidence, lack of experience, bias, fear of isolation, and undermining relationships (Jalilian & Batmani, 2014;Wynen et al, 2019). Thus, we chose four of these reasons for our research based on the instrument we used, taking into consideration the research setting and sample:…”
Section: Reasons Of Organizational Silencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors were among the first to use the concept "organisational silence". They created the concept of silence climate to explain how standards of the organisational culture impacted employee silence (Wynen et al, 2019). The authors suggested that employees remained silent because they knew that it was pointless or dangerous to express their opinion in the context of their organisation.…”
Section: Definition Of Organisational Silencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the above, defensive silence is active behaviour of an employee (Wynen et al, 2019). This type of silence means the belief that speaking up was risky for the held position because of possible arguments, contradictions or sanctions and that this risk outweighed the advantages of speaking up.…”
Section: Types Of Organisational Silencementioning
confidence: 99%