‘Just not for me’ – contributing factors to nonattendance/noncompletion at phase III cardiac rehabilitation in acute coronary syndrome patients: a qualitative enquiry

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore what reasons do nonattenders and noncompleters give for their patterns of participation or nonparticipation in cardiac rehabilitation programmes and how future uptake could be enhanced. Background Cardiac rehabilitation is a cost‐effective clinical intervention designed for adults with acute coronary syndrome. Despite evidence from meta‐analyses demonstrating that cardiac rehabilitation programmes facilitate physical and psychological recovery from acute coronary syndrome, only 20–50% of eligible patients attend Phase III outpatient programmes. Design A qualitative study using thematic analysis. Method Within the context of a larger mixed‐method study, acute coronary syndrome patients were recruited between 2012–2014 from three hospitals in Scotland. Of 214 patients who consented to enrol in the main study, a purposive subsample of 25 participants was recruited. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three major influences of participation were identified: (1) personal factors, (2) programme factors and (3) practical factors. In addition, valuable suggestions for future programme modifications were provided. A significant barrier to attending cardiac rehabilitation programmes is that participants perceived themselves to be unsuitable for the programme alongside a lack of knowledge and/or misconceptions regarding cardiac rehabilitation. Conclusion The responses of nonattenders and noncompleters revealed misconceptions related to programme suitability, the intensity of exercise required and the purpose of a cardiac rehabilitation programme. As long as these misconceptions continue to persist in coronary syndrome patients, this will impact upon attendance. The lack of perceived need for cardiac rehabilitation stems from a poor understanding of the programme, especially among nonattenders and noncompleters and subsequently an inability to comprehend possible benefits. Relevance to clinical practice The knowledge of common misconceptions puts clinical nurses in a better position to identify and pro‐actively address these erroneous assumptions in their patients in order to improve participation in cardiac rehabilitation.

Longitudinal evaluation of the effects of illness perceptions and beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation on quality of life of patients with coronary artery disease and their caregivers

“…Consistent with our findings, other studies have found a positive correlation between coherence and physical health but in [15]. Consistent with Cooper et al [29,45], and Herber et al [69], we identified that the patients' perceived significant barriers to CR, but quality of life was not assessed in these studies. We identified the patient's perceptions of control (B-IPQ) did not significantly predict their physical health (i.e.…”

Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review

“…This can be supported through a course of cardiac rehabilitation offered through the national health service (NHS), though uptake is low [18]. Whilst there are many reasons why this may be the case [19][20][21][22], some of it may be due to inadequate levels of health literacy.…”

Exploring patient-reported outcomes of home-based cardiac rehabilitation in relation to Scottish, UK and European guidelines: an audit using qualitative methods

“…Recent figures have highlighted that the UK has internationally leading levels of uptake, despite still falling short of national recommendations 8. Current evidence suggests that perceived barriers to traditional, centre-based CR may include practical barriers, personal or programme factors 9. Therefore, the future of CR requires flexible delivery and personalisation of care,6 while being mindful of organisational and financial constraints.…”