‘Just sustainability’: the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain?

Abstract

Environmental justice is both a vocabulary for political opportunity, mobilization and action, and a policy principle to guide public decision making. It emerged initially in the US, and more recently in the UK, as a new vocabulary underpinning action by community organizations campaigning against environmental injustices. However, as the environmental justice discourse has matured, it has become increasingly evident that it should play a role in the wider agendas for sustainable development and social inclusion. The links between sustainability and environmental justice are becoming clearer and more widely understood in the UK by NGOs and government alike, and it is the potential synergy between these two discourses which is the focus of this paper. This paper argues that the concept of ‘just sustainability’ provides a discourse for policymakers and activists, which brings together the key dimensions of both environmental justice and sustainable development.

Fair fracking? Ethics and environmental justice in United Kingdom shale gas policy and planning

“…It is necessary to examine fracking governance beyond the narrow definitions of national supply and demand for fossil fuels as a public good, to focus upon attendant positive and negative socio-economic and environment effects to local communities and to the involvement of community actors in environmental decision-making. The concept of environmental justice and the related notion of energy justice (see for example Sovacool 2013) connotes both grassroots political activism and academic analysis of environmental rights, racism and classism, the fair distribution of risks weighed against socio-economic benefits, and the protection of community voice, political, socio-cultural and place identities (Schlosberg 2007, Agyeman and Evans 2004, Agyeman 2005). …”

Knowledge for just urban sustainability

“…Who benefits? (Agyeman and Evans 2004). As boundaries are moving and the practices we have criticised are also shaped and informed by those within universities, these contexts themselves need examination in terms of the content of what is produced, how and with whom?…”

Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis

“…This concerns the equitable distribution of environmental risks weighed against social and material benefits. Distributive injustice occurs when risk burdens fall upon populations predominantly composed of black people, migrant workers and the working poor alongside other socio-economically marginalised groups that are bounded by proximity to environmentally polluting sites, and benefits are felt by broader populations beyond the proximity of the immediate risk burden (Agyeman and Evans, 2004;Kaswan, 2002;Schlosberg, 2007;Walker et al, 2005).…”