2010
DOI: 10.1177/001440291007600303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Justifying and Explaining Disproportionality, 1968–2008: A Critique of Underlying Views of Culture

Abstract: r: special education has made considerable advances in researcb, policy, and practice in its short history. However, students fiom bistorically underserved groups continue to be disproportionately identified as requiring special education. Support for color-blind practices and policies can justify racial disproportionality in special education and signal a retrenchment to deficit views about students fiom historically underserved groups. We respond to these emerging concerns through an analysis of arguments th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
168
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
168
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was an interesting finding in the light of the current overrepresentation of children of minority backgrounds in special education programs (Artiles, Kozleski, Trent, Osher, & Ortiz, 2010;Garcia & Ortiz, 2006).…”
Section: Single Mandatory Course Versus Infusion Approachmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This was an interesting finding in the light of the current overrepresentation of children of minority backgrounds in special education programs (Artiles, Kozleski, Trent, Osher, & Ortiz, 2010;Garcia & Ortiz, 2006).…”
Section: Single Mandatory Course Versus Infusion Approachmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For example, some data suggest that CLD parents, lower socio-economic status (SES) parents and parents with less education tend to be less involved in school than White parents, parents with higher SES status, and parents with more educated (Artiles et al, 2010;Duchnowski et al, 2012;Epstein, 1995;Fantuzzo, Tighe, & Childs, 2000;Grolnick & Slowiaczek, 1994;Harry, 2002;Hosp & Reschly, 2004;Rodriguez, Fishman, & Nickerson, 2015;Wagner et al, 2012;Zhang & Bennett, 2003). Childcare and other barriers can prohibit CLD parents from participating in the same ways as White parents, yet studies indicate they do participate.…”
Section: The Difficulty Of Defining Parental Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars addressing transition outcomes of CLD youth with disabilities have argued that existing knowledge in special education has yet to assemble robust evidence-based practices to address the strengths and needs of this unique population in U.S. schools (Artiles et al, 2010). Some authors have endorsed family-centered practices as a means for increasing positive outcomes for CLD youth with disabilities (Dunst & Trivette, 2005;King et al, 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%