Summary. In spite of the fact that the diagnosis of haemophilia is essentially clinical and laboratorybased, imaging has become an important tool for the evaluation of complications, diagnostic confirmation and/or complementation and therapeutic follow-up in haemophilic arthropathy. Radiography remains the workforce horse in the diagnosis and follow-up of haemophilic arthropathy. The radiographical findings in arthropathy follow an expected sequence of events and are overall similar in different joints. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has advantages over radiography based on its capability of visualizing soft tissue and cartilage changes in haemophilic joints. The recent development and standardization of MRI scoring systems for measuring soft tissue and cartilage abnormalities may enable the comparison of pathological joint findings in clinical trials conducted at different institutions across the world. The implementation of high-frequency transducers and colour/power Doppler capabilities has provided new insights for clinical applications of ultrasonography (US) in haemophilic arthropathy. In spite of the imaging modality's technical challenges such as operator-dependency, US has advantages over MRI. One of these advantages is its ability of differentiating synovium hypertrophy and hemosiderin deposition, which is not possible with MRI given the presence of susceptibility artefacts from extracellular hemosiderin on gradient-echo MR images. In addition to the aforementioned conventional imaging modalities, novel imaging techniques (blood oxygen level dependent, ultrasmall superparamagnetic ironoxide contrast-enhanced, and T1 and T2 mapping MRI, ultrasound biomicroscopy, microbubble contrast-enhanced US and positron emission tomography, among others) hold promise for early assessment of haemophilic arthropathy in the future upon completion of their clinical validation.