2004
DOI: 10.5558/tfc80583-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juvenile stand responses and potential outcomes of conifer release efforts on Alberta's spruce–aspen mixedwood sites

Abstract: Twelve Alberta forest regeneration blocks, situated on representative white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) -trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) boreal mixedwood sites, planted to white spruce, and operationally released with glyphosate herbicide, were surveyed in the fall of 2002. Stand structure and composition were quantified and compared for treated and untreated portions of each block. The Mixedwood Growth Model (MGM, Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta) was used to proje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it appears that two to four years of complete vegetation control within a 2-m radius around spruce planted at 5-m spacing is capable of maximizing the early performance of both spruce and aspen as a single cohort, intimate mixture. With the exception of higher-than-anticipated mortality on the spruce, this strategy appears to have the potential to provide an early rotation of aspen (~30 years) and a longer-term (> 60 years) sawtimber crop of spruce, as modelled by Pitt et al (2004b). Such a strategy could conceivably be targeted at suitable microsites to mitigate the spruce mortality observed in the experiment.…”
Section: Vegetation Management For Mixedwood Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it appears that two to four years of complete vegetation control within a 2-m radius around spruce planted at 5-m spacing is capable of maximizing the early performance of both spruce and aspen as a single cohort, intimate mixture. With the exception of higher-than-anticipated mortality on the spruce, this strategy appears to have the potential to provide an early rotation of aspen (~30 years) and a longer-term (> 60 years) sawtimber crop of spruce, as modelled by Pitt et al (2004b). Such a strategy could conceivably be targeted at suitable microsites to mitigate the spruce mortality observed in the experiment.…”
Section: Vegetation Management For Mixedwood Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research and operational experience have shown that fairly rigorous vegetation management is required to counter the natural propensity of upland boreal sites to regenerate aspen following harvest (Wood and von Althen 1993, Cole et al 2003, Pitt and Bell 2005, Boateng et al 2006 and that unintentional, intimate mixedwoods are often the result of conventional conifer regeneration efforts (Navratil et al 1991, Pitt et al 2004a2004b, Pitt andBell 2005). In 2000, we worked with a coalition of forest industry partners to formulate and test a practical regeneration strategy for a singlecohort, intimate mixture of spruce and aspen that would capitalize on the natural propensity of these sites to regenerate aspen following harvest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies of vegetation management treatments applied to white spruce and results range from large increases in growth following treatment (Yang 1991, Jobidon 2000, Dampier et al 2006, through moderate increases (Biring et al 1999, Comeau et al 2003, Pitt et al 2004 to relatively small responses (Brand and Janas 1988, Groot 1999, Simard and Hannam 2000, Posner and Jordan 2002, Heineman et al 2005. We speculate that deciduous trees may be solely competitive in some situations while, in others, their presence facilitates spruce growth by ameliorating effects of summer frosts (Groot andCarlson 1996, Posner andJordan 2002), reducing evaporative demand (Bladon et al 2006), or improving nutrient cycling (Man andLieffers 1999, Simard andHannam 2000).…”
Section: Interceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By giving all the credit for size asymmetry to competition, we create unrealistic expectations of improved growth once the neighbours are removed. Accurate determination of the effects of neighbours on tree growth requires density manipulation experiments (e.g., Vanclay 1994, Pitt et al 2004, Bokalo et al 2007.…”
Section: Interceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herbicides are a highly effective means of assuring investments in reforestation (Pitt et al 2004, Wagner et al 2006. Decades of research have shown herbicides to be an effective means of renewing forests around the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%