2018
DOI: 10.1002/ab.21792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juveniles with a history of violent behavior show cognitive performance and electrophysiology consistent with inhibitory control and emotional feedback processing problems

Abstract: Inhibitory control and the effects of negative emotional feedback were investigated in adolescents with a history of violent behavior and normal adolescents using the Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP), a task simulating real situations of social interaction to elicit aggressive behavior and negative emotions, with concurrent event related potential recordings. The Reactive Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPAQ), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and the Negative Mood Regulation (NMR) Scale were also pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I 3 theory, Slotter & Finkel, 2011 ). Problems with inhibitory control were found in samples characterized by aggressive behavior, such as violent male adult offenders (Meijers, Harte, Meynen, & Cuijpers, 2017 ) and juvenile offenders (Chen, Chiou, & Ko, 2019 ; Zhang, Wang, Liu, Song, & Yang, 2017 ). Development of inhibitory control during adolescence is driven by changes in relevant brain networks (Blakemore & Robbins, 2012 ; Casey & Caudle, 2013 ; Constantinidis & Luna, 2019 ), for example, maturation of the prefrontal cortex, a key brain region involved in inhibition.…”
Section: Inhibitory Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I 3 theory, Slotter & Finkel, 2011 ). Problems with inhibitory control were found in samples characterized by aggressive behavior, such as violent male adult offenders (Meijers, Harte, Meynen, & Cuijpers, 2017 ) and juvenile offenders (Chen, Chiou, & Ko, 2019 ; Zhang, Wang, Liu, Song, & Yang, 2017 ). Development of inhibitory control during adolescence is driven by changes in relevant brain networks (Blakemore & Robbins, 2012 ; Casey & Caudle, 2013 ; Constantinidis & Luna, 2019 ), for example, maturation of the prefrontal cortex, a key brain region involved in inhibition.…”
Section: Inhibitory Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study using the Taylor Aggression Paradigm, a task simulating real situations of social interactions to elicit aggressive behaviour and negative emotions, adolescents with a history of violent behaviour showed higher reactive and proactive aggression as well as higher impulsivity than the controls when confronted with negative (emotional) feedback. Evidence was also found for impaired regulation of negative affect and inhibitory control in comparison with control participants (Chen, Chiou & Ko, 2018). Deficits in cognitive flexibility (set‐shifting) and impaired feedback‐processing have been advanced to explain the persistent pattern of aggressive behaviour among young male prisoners, despite negative consequences of the aggression apparent to others (e.g., Vilà‐Balló et al., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The N2 is a negative frontocentral wave that peaks 200 to 350 ms after stimulus onset in tasks demanding attention or response inhibition [ 192 ]. Using mediation analyses, one group reported an association between PA and reduced N2 during the decision phase of the TAP for impulsively violent adolescent offenders [ 99 ]. A reduction in general inhibitory control, as indexed by the N2, is likely more indicative of the impulsive, reactively aggressive traits of the study participants and less so to PA specifically.…”
Section: Neurophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%