2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-53132-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

k-Abelian Equivalence and Rationality

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another result, more in the spirit of classical formal language theory, is shown in [2] (for a detailed proof, see [3]):…”
Section: Definition 1 the Words Umentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another result, more in the spirit of classical formal language theory, is shown in [2] (for a detailed proof, see [3]):…”
Section: Definition 1 the Words Umentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This turned out to be quite an interesting approach. It allowed, see [2,3], to show that the union of singleton classes is a regular language. Similarly, the set of all lexicographically least (or, equivalently, greatest) representatives constitutes a regular set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, using the automata-theoretic characterization of the complexity function, we solve the open problem of the original conference version, by showing that for each m and k the complexity function P k,m giving the number of equivalence classes of words of length n, is not only of order Θ n m k−1 (m−1) , but actually asymptotic to Cn m k−1 (m−1) for some rational constant C. This paper is an extended full version of the conference presentation [11]. Here v = S k,u (i, j, l, m); the white rectangles symbolize x and the black rectangles symbolize y.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%