2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-007-0176-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K–Ar ages of granitoids unravel the stages of Neo-Tethyan convergence in the eastern Pontides and central Anatolia, Turkey

Abstract: K-Ar dating of mineral separates extracted from various granitoid rock units of the eastern Pontides and central Anatolia, Turkey, has provided some new insights unravelling various stages of the Neo-Tethyan convergence system, which evolved with northward subduction between the Eurasian plate (EP) to the north and the Tauride-Anatolide platform (TAP) to the south along the _ Izmir-Ankara-Erzincan suture (IAES) zone. Arcrelated granitoid rocks are only encountered in the eastern Pontides and yield K-Ar cooling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data presented establish that AIA granitoids with differing composition were formed during the Late Cretaceous between 84 and 74 Ma. The mineralogical, geochemical, and geochronological data are consistent with a multi-stage magmatic evolution of the granitoids in central Anatolia (e.g., Kadioglu et al 2006;Boztug and Harlavan 2008). The generation of S-and I-type granitoids at ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data presented establish that AIA granitoids with differing composition were formed during the Late Cretaceous between 84 and 74 Ma. The mineralogical, geochemical, and geochronological data are consistent with a multi-stage magmatic evolution of the granitoids in central Anatolia (e.g., Kadioglu et al 2006;Boztug and Harlavan 2008). The generation of S-and I-type granitoids at ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Accordingly, these monzonitic I-type CAG of ca. 74 Ma age, together with some A-type granitoids, are interpreted to be related to melting of lower crustal granitic and granulitic rocks, residual material from the older metamorphic and magmatic events, and probably the subcontinental lithospheric mantle rocks with heat supplied by mantle-derived mafic magma underplating of the lower crust as a result of lithospheric delamination and thinning (e.g., Göncüoglu and Türeli 1994;Aydin et al 1998;Boztug 1998Boztug , 2000Düzgören-Aydin et al 2001;Köksal et al 2004;Ilbeyli et al 2004;Boztug et al 2007a, b, c;Boztug and Arehart 2007;Boztug and Harlavan 2008;Boztug et al 2009) in this post-collisional period (Fig. 9d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The closure of the southern Taurides and eastern Pontides are constrained to be Late Paleocene (OKAY and SAHINTÜ RK 1997). Late Cretaceous arc magmatism is represented predominantly by calc-alkaline basic to acidic volcanic rocks and crosscutting I-type granitoids in the northern zone of the eastern Pontides (e.g., OKAY and SAHINTÜ RK 1997;BOZTUG and HARLAVAN, 2008;KAYGUSUZ et al, 2008), and the late stages of the arc magmatism by small outcrops of Paleocene ultrapotassic plagioleucitites (ALTHERR et al, 2008). Postcollusional Eocene igneous activity is represented by andesitic to basaltic volcanics and I-type middle-to high-K-granitoids (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dating of magmatism in central Anatolia was practiced in several studies. The resulting ages vary in a wide range from 58.7 Ma (Cankılı monzonite; Boztuğ and Harlavan, 2008) to 84.1 Ma (Ağaçören granite; Köksal et al, 2012). The geochemical and geochronological data from the plutonic rocks in the CACC indicate both synand postcollisional magmatism.…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%