2015
DOI: 10.1142/s1005386715000656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

k-Decomposable Monomial Ideals

Abstract: We introduce pretty k-clean monomial ideals and k-decomposable multicomplexes, respectively, as the extensions of the notions of k-clean monomial ideals and k-decomposable simplicial complexes. We show that a multicomplex Γ is k-decomposable if and only if its associated monomial ideal I(Γ) is pretty k-clean. Also, we prove that an arbitrary monomial ideal I is pretty k-clean if and only if its polarization I p is k-clean. Our results extend and generalize some results due to Herzog-Popescu, Soleyman Jahan and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) If there is a variable x ∈ X and vertex splittable ideals I 1 and I 2 of k[X\{x}] so that I = xI 1 + I 2 , I 2 ⊆ I 1 and G(I) is the disjoint union of G(xI 1 ) and G(I 2 ), then I is a vertex splittable ideal. With the above notations if I = xI 1 + I 2 is a vertex splittable ideal, then xI 1 + I 2 is called a vertex splitting for I and x is called a splitting vertex for I.Recently, the notion of a k-decomposable ideal was introduced in[19] and it was proved that it is the dual concept for k-decomposable simplicial complexes.In the case k = 0, 0-decomposable simplicial complexes are precisely vertex decomposable simplicial complexes. Considering k = 0 in [19, Definition 2.3], one can see that a shedding monomial u in a 0-decomposable ideal I necessarily should satisfy the property I u = (0), where I u = (v ∈ G(I) : [u, v] = 1) and [u, v] is the greatest common divisor of u and v, while in Definition 2.1, it is not the case, i.e., the way that a monomial ideal splits in Definition 2.1 is different from one in [19, Definition 2.3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) If there is a variable x ∈ X and vertex splittable ideals I 1 and I 2 of k[X\{x}] so that I = xI 1 + I 2 , I 2 ⊆ I 1 and G(I) is the disjoint union of G(xI 1 ) and G(I 2 ), then I is a vertex splittable ideal. With the above notations if I = xI 1 + I 2 is a vertex splittable ideal, then xI 1 + I 2 is called a vertex splitting for I and x is called a splitting vertex for I.Recently, the notion of a k-decomposable ideal was introduced in[19] and it was proved that it is the dual concept for k-decomposable simplicial complexes.In the case k = 0, 0-decomposable simplicial complexes are precisely vertex decomposable simplicial complexes. Considering k = 0 in [19, Definition 2.3], one can see that a shedding monomial u in a 0-decomposable ideal I necessarily should satisfy the property I u = (0), where I u = (v ∈ G(I) : [u, v] = 1) and [u, v] is the greatest common divisor of u and v, while in Definition 2.1, it is not the case, i.e., the way that a monomial ideal splits in Definition 2.1 is different from one in [19, Definition 2.3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following theorem was proved in [10]. In order to prove Theorem 2.4, one needs to know the construction of the order of linear quotients for a decomposable ideal.…”
Section: Regularity and Projective Dimension Of The Stanley-reisner Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that a d-dimensional simplicial complex is d-decomposable if and only if it is shellable (see [14,Theorem 3.6]). In [10], the concept of a kdecomposable monomial ideal was introduced and it was proved that a simplicial complex ∆ is k-decomposable if and only if I ∆ ∨ is a k-decomposable ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we study the behavior of expansion functor on the property of having linear quotients. First, we recall some notations and definitions from [12]:…”
Section: The Expansion Of Some Classes Of Monomial Idealsmentioning
confidence: 99%