2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-016-0559-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-means clustering analysis and artificial neural network classification of fatigue strain signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification process is performed by using an artificial neural network (ANN) for optimal pattern recognition. Experiments show that their algorithm is about 92% accurate [ 5 ]. Wang et al predict natural disasters by modeling meteorological disasters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification process is performed by using an artificial neural network (ANN) for optimal pattern recognition. Experiments show that their algorithm is about 92% accurate [ 5 ]. Wang et al predict natural disasters by modeling meteorological disasters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After K-means clustering algorithm was proposed, it has been widely studied and applied in different disciplines. K-means clustering has been extensively applied in the field of dam safety evaluation, including clustering of displacement, seepage, and stress [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: K-means Clustering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al applied ANN to the classification of fatigue strain signal to obtain the best pattern recognition. The classification accuracy of ANN is 92%, and five levels of fatigue damage are obtained [ 20 ]. The ANN has a high demand for computing power and a long training time, so it is not suitable for the scene with real-time requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%