2014
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/1/8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-Shell Photoabsorption of Magnesium Ions

Abstract: X-ray photoabsorption cross sections have been computed for all magnesium ions using the R-matrix method. A comparison with the other available data for Mg II-Mg X shows good qualitative agreement in the resultant resonance shapes. However, for the lower ionization stages, and for singly-ionized Mg II in particular, the previous R-matrix results (Witthoeft et al. 2009;Witthoeft et al. 2011) overestimate the K-edge position due to the neglect of important orbital relaxation effects, and a global shift downward … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We update the photo-absorption cross section of neutral magnesium in Spex, adding the resonance transitions, 1s → np, calculated using the Flexible Atomic Code 7 (A. Raassen, private communication). Our neutral Mg K-shell cross section is consistent with the Mg i profile obtained by Hasoglu et al (2014) applying the R−matrix method.…”
Section: Continuumsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We update the photo-absorption cross section of neutral magnesium in Spex, adding the resonance transitions, 1s → np, calculated using the Flexible Atomic Code 7 (A. Raassen, private communication). Our neutral Mg K-shell cross section is consistent with the Mg i profile obtained by Hasoglu et al (2014) applying the R−matrix method.…”
Section: Continuumsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The photoabsorption cross-sections below 10 keV are taken from the tables of Gatuzz et al (2015) 1 . They compile cross-sections obtained using different analytic methods (Bethe & Salpeter 1957), the R-matrix method (Gorczyca 2000;García et al 2005García et al , 2009Juett et al 2006;Witthoeft et al 2009Witthoeft et al , 2011Gorczyca et al 2013;Hasoglu et al 2014), semi-empirical fits (Verner & Yakovlev 1995), and experimental values (Kortright & Kim 2000). The tables cover energies from 0.01 keV to 10 keV with 650 000 logarithmically spaced steps, which results in a relative energy resolution of 10 −5 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, Wilms et al (2000) developed the TBabs and TBnew absorption models that have been widely used in the last decade. However, they only include neutral atomic species compromising their ability to render complex ISM spectral structures such as the O, Ne, and Mg K edges (Juett et al 2004(Juett et al , 2006Hasoglu et al 2014). Given this limitation, we have devised a new ISM X-ray absorption model-to be referred to as ISMabs-that compiles the most accurate atomic data available for neutrally, singly, and doubly ionized species of H, He, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ar and Ca; in the case of iron, an experimental cross section has been chosen to Gorczyca (2000) and adjusted to astrophysical observations.…”
Section: Ismabs Photoabsorption Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of magnesium, new photoabsorption cross sections by Bradshaw et al (1999) and h Sala & Greiner (2006). Hasoglu et al (2014) in warmabs were used to fit the Mg K edge in XMM-Newton spectra of the LMXB GS 1826-238 predicting that most of this element was in ionized form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%